# LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm2-5-24b-a2b-vs-longcat-flash-lite-sparse
- Last updated: October 13, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LFM2.5-24B-A2B and LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has the lower published output-token price.
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | Meituan |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 37.8 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 17 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.10 / $1.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 30.2 (Estimated · #88/124)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AutomationBench | 27.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 65.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 8.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | 83.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | 26.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 33.7% | Coming soon |
| VITA-Bench | Coming soon | 21.7% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 45.6% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 48.6% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 28.5 (Estimated · #98/149)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | 32.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 51% | 68.2% | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 40.6% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 59.3% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 33.7% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 40.8 (Estimated · #112/181)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 74.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 74.4% | 69.5% | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
| HLE | 7.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU | Coming soon | 85.3% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 79.2% | Coming soon |
| CMMLU | Coming soon | 84.3% | Coming soon |
| C-Eval | Coming soon | 85.8% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 75.6 (#61/128)
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 96.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFBench | 74.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon
- LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MATH-500 | 96.0% | 95.8% | LFM2.5-24B-A2B |
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 65.7% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | Coming soon | 40.5% | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | Coming soon | 49.4% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LFM2.5-24B-A2B and LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-longcat-flash-lite-sparse)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-longcat-flash-lite-sparse)

## Explore More

- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B profile](/models/lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [LongCat-Flash-Lite-Sparse profile](/models/longcat-flash-lite-sparse)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)