# LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Mistral Medium 3.5 128B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm2-5-24b-a2b-vs-mistral-medium-3-5-128b
- Last updated: October 13, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LFM2.5-24B-A2B and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B has the lower published output-token price.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B has the larger published context window at 256K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | Mistral |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 131K | 256K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 37.8 | 33.58 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.10 / $1.00 | $1.50 / $7.50 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 30.2 (Estimated · #88/124)
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B public-lane score: 19.2 (Supported · #105/124)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AutomationBench | 27.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 65.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 8.0% | 91.4% | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B |
| PinchBench | 83.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | 26.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 39.10% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 39.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 28.5 (Estimated · #98/149)
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B public-lane score: 23 (Estimated · #113/149)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | 32.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 51% | 77.6% | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 66.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B public-lane score: 73.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B public-lane score: 60.1 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 40.8 (Estimated · #112/181)
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B public-lane score: 31.9 (Supported · #145/181)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 74.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 74.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 7.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 34.8% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 75.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 75.6 (#61/128)
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B public-lane score: 84 (#50/128)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 96.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFBench | 74.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Mistral Medium 3.5 128B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Mistral Medium 3.5 128B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MATH-500 | 96.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LFM2.5-24B-A2B and Mistral Medium 3.5 128B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-mistral-medium-3-5-128b)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Mistral Medium 3.5 128B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-mistral-medium-3-5-128b)

## Explore More

- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B profile](/models/lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Mistral Medium 3.5 128B profile](/models/mistral-medium-3-5-128b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)