# LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm2-5-24b-a2b-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash
- Last updated: October 13, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 4
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has the higher overall point estimate 69 to 37.8. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The clearest category separation is in instruction following, where the averages are 75.6 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and 91.6 for Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is HLE in Knowledge, with scores of 7.4% and 36.5%.
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Overall Score | 37.8 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 19 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.10 / $1.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Not comparable
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 30.2 (Estimated · #88/124)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AutomationBench | 27.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 65.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 8.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | 83.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | 26.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CoWorkBench | Coming soon | 75.3% | Coming soon |
| AndroidWorld | Coming soon | 87.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Not comparable
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 28.5 (Estimated · #98/149)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | 32.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 51% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 63.3% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 80.5% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 48.9% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 57.8% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 92.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 89.7 (Unranked · 7 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vision2Web | Coming soon | 62.9% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 71.0% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 76.9% | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 87.7% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 91.8% | Coming soon |
| MathVision w/ Python | Coming soon | 96.2% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 83.5% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 91.4% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Not comparable
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 40.8 (Estimated · #112/181)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 74.4% | 91% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
| GPQA-D | 74.4% | 91.0% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
| HLE | 7.4% | 36.5% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: 75.6 (#61/128)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 91.6 (#21/128)

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 96.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFBench | 74.7% | 81.5% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- LFM2.5-24B-A2B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MATH-500 | 96.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, LFM2.5-24B-A2B or Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### Where is the biggest gap between LFM2.5-24B-A2B and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash?

The widest category gap is in instruction following, where the averages are 75.6 for LFM2.5-24B-A2B and 91.6 for Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash.

### How many benchmarks does LFM2.5-24B-A2B cover on BenchLM?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B currently has 13 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash cover on BenchLM?

Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash currently has 19 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash)
- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash)

## Explore More

- [LFM2.5-24B-A2B profile](/models/lfm2-5-24b-a2b)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash profile](/models/qwen3-8-omni-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)