# LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm2-5-vl-1-6b-extract-vs-lfm2-5-vl-450m-extract
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | LiquidAI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Non-Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 3 | 3 |
| Pricing (input/output) | N/A | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract public-lane score: 0 (#48/48)
- LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract | LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Liquid Extract JSON Validity | 99.6% | 98.9% | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract |
| Liquid Extract F1 | 99.6% | 98.8% | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract |
| Liquid Extract VLM Judge | 90.6% | 84.5% | LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract and LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-lfm2-5-vl-1-6b-extract)
- [LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-lfm2-5-vl-450m-extract)
- [LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-lfm2-5-vl-1-6b-extract)
- [LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-lfm2-5-vl-450m-extract)

## Explore More

- [LFM2.5-VL-1.6B-Extract profile](/models/lfm2-5-vl-1-6b-extract)
- [LFM2.5-VL-450M-Extract profile](/models/lfm2-5-vl-450m-extract)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)