# LFM3-1.7B vs Trinity-Large-Thinking

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LFM3-1.7B and Trinity-Large-Thinking across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/lfm3-1-7b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: October 27, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LFM3-1.7B and Trinity-Large-Thinking share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- LFM3-1.7B has the lower published output-token price.
- Trinity-Large-Thinking has the larger published context window at 512K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LFM3-1.7B | Trinity-Large-Thinking |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | LiquidAI | Arcee AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 256K | 512K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 22.99 | 34.67 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 24 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.25 / $0.90 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM3-1.7B public-lane score: 14.4 (Estimated · #123/134)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 14.7 (Estimated · #122/134)

| Benchmark | LFM3-1.7B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AutomationBench | 41.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 71.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 68.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WebArena-Verified | 38.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 32.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ToolSandbox | 80.36% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 68.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 13.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 12.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveClaw | 45.60% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench Airline | Coming soon | 88.0% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 32.55% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM3-1.7B public-lane score: 13 (Estimated · #142/155)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 18.1 (Supported · #128/155)

| Benchmark | LFM3-1.7B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SciCode | 28.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 43.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | 23% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 12.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 73.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench Pro | 31.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified* | Coming soon | 63.2% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM3-1.7B public-lane score: 61.3 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 51.1 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | LFM3-1.7B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| RULER (128K) | 65.56% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM3-1.7B public-lane score: 25.5 (Estimated · #175/189)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 34.1 (Estimated · #141/189)

| Benchmark | LFM3-1.7B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 63.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 63.4% | 76.3% | Trinity-Large-Thinking |
| HLE | 7.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | Coming soon | 83.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM3-1.7B public-lane score: 71.7 (#76/156)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 28.9 (#139/156)

| Benchmark | LFM3-1.7B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 96.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFBench | 73.0% | 52.3% | LFM3-1.7B |
| Multi-IF | 89.10% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFStruct | 93.72% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LFM3-1.7B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LFM3-1.7B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME25 (Arcee) | Coming soon | 96.3% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LFM3-1.7B and Trinity-Large-Thinking?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-1.7B-Base](/compare/lfm3-1-7b-vs-lfm3-1-7b-base)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking vs LFM3-1.7B-Base](/compare/lfm3-1-7b-base-vs-trinity-large-thinking)
- [LFM3-1.7B vs LFM3-Audio-2B](/compare/lfm3-1-7b-vs-lfm3-audio-2b)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking vs LFM3-Audio-2B](/compare/lfm3-audio-2b-vs-trinity-large-thinking)

## Explore More

- [LFM3-1.7B profile](/models/lfm3-1-7b)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking profile](/models/trinity-large-thinking)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)