# Ling 2.6 Flash vs Qwen3.5 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 2.6 Flash and Qwen3.5 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-2-6-flash-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: September 27, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 0
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

No benchmark verdict yet: there is no shared sourced benchmark row for Ling 2.6 Flash and Qwen3.5 Flash.

## Summary

- Ling 2.6 Flash and Qwen3.5 Flash do not currently share a sourced benchmark row. The mirror therefore compares metadata, pricing, context windows, and each model's separately reported coverage without naming a benchmark winner.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 2.6 Flash | Qwen3.5 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 33.65 | 45.49 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 0 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.10 / $0.40 |

## Category Breakdown

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 23.8 (Estimated · #105/135)
- Qwen3.5 Flash public-lane score: 26.5 (Estimated · #97/135)

| Benchmark | Ling 2.6 Flash | Qwen3.5 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | Coming soon | 83.3% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | Coming soon | 64.4% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 43.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.5 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 31.5 (Estimated · #122/158)
- Qwen3.5 Flash public-lane score: 43 (Estimated · #80/158)

| Benchmark | Ling 2.6 Flash | Qwen3.5 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | Coming soon | 84.1% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: 37.5 (#107/124)
- Qwen3.5 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 2.6 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.5 Flash public-lane score: 28.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Ling 2.6 Flash | Qwen3.5 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | Coming soon | 6.207% | Coming soon |
| FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4) | Coming soon | 0.000% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Can I compare Ling 2.6 Flash and Qwen3.5 Flash on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but sourced benchmark coverage is still incomplete for a fair score-level comparison.

### Why does this page show "coming soon" values?

BenchLM only calls winners when public benchmark coverage is available on both sides of the comparison.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 2.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-ling-2-6-flash)
- [Qwen3.5 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-qwen3-5-flash)
- [Ling 2.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-ling-2-6-flash)
- [Qwen3.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwen3-5-flash)

## Explore More

- [Ling 2.6 Flash profile](/models/ling-2-6-flash)
- [Qwen3.5 Flash profile](/models/qwen3-5-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)