# Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs LongCat-2.5

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and LongCat-2.5 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-longcat-2-5
- Last updated: November 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and LongCat-2.5 share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the lower published output-token price.
- LongCat-2.5 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | LongCat-2.5 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Meituan |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Hybrid |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 22 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.30 / $1.20 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | LongCat-2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 80.2% | 91.9% | LongCat-2.5 |
| DeepSearchQA | 90.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 57.1% | 63.1% | LongCat-2.5 |
| MCP Atlas | 75.6% | 83.1% | LongCat-2.5 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 88.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 38.50% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 51.8% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 38.5% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 65.4% | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 63.3% | Coming soon |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | Coming soon | 34.9% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 78.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | LongCat-2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 88.4% | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | Coming soon | 25.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 64.6% | Coming soon |
| PaperBench | Coming soon | 82.1% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 58.3% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 60.5% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | LongCat-2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vision2Web | Coming soon | 78.6% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 90.2% | Coming soon |
| MathVision w/ Python | Coming soon | 96.5% | Coming soon |
| Video-MME | Coming soon | 85.2% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | LongCat-2.5 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 54.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 51.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| FrontierScience | Coming soon | 77% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and LongCat-2.5?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [LongCat-2.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-longcat-2-5)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [LongCat-2.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vl-vs-longcat-2-5)

## Explore More

- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [LongCat-2.5 profile](/models/longcat-2-5)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)