# Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Muse Glimmer 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and Muse Glimmer 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and Muse Glimmer 30B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 41.15 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 14 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 25.3 (Estimated · #107/132)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 80.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 90.8% | 74.6% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| HLE w/ tools | 57.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 75.6% | 75.5% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 44.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 65.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 30.5 (Estimated · #97/153)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 51.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 76% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 51.7% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 43.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 82.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 65.1 (#42/55)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 74% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 43.8 (Estimated · #106/187)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 54.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 51.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 81.1 (#59/152)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 77% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 84.6 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 94.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and Muse Glimmer 30B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vl-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)

## Explore More

- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)