# Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-reflection-beam-nvfp4
- Last updated: October 23, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 4
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Pick Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ling 3.0 Flash Sante only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 leads overall 70 to 68.
- The clearest category separation is in reasoning, where the averages are 73.4 for Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and 84.7 for Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is DeepSearchQA in Agentic, with scores of 90.8% and 81.1%.
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Reflection AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Overall Score | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 19 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Not comparable
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BrowseComp | 80.2% | 75.6% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| DeepSearchQA | 90.8% | 81.1% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| HLE w/ tools | 57.1% | 51.1% | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante |
| MCP Atlas | 75.6% | 80.5% | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 |
| τ³-bench results | Coming soon | 35.4% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 78.4% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Not comparable
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 42.7% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 65.6% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 78.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 31.4% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 77.5% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 80.7% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 46.9% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 public-lane score: 84.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CritPt | Coming soon | 15.4% | Coming soon |
| LongBench v2 | Coming soon | 67.2% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Not comparable
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 54.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MedXpertQA (Text) | 51.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 89.3% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 34.8% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 public-lane score: 86.2 (#46/152)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 79.2% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- Ling 3.0 Flash Sante public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 public-lane score: 87.9 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash Sante | Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 97.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Ling 3.0 Flash Sante or Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4?

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4?

The widest category gap is in reasoning, where the averages are 73.4 for Ling 3.0 Flash Sante and 84.7 for Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4.

### How many benchmarks does Ling 3.0 Flash Sante cover on BenchLM?

Ling 3.0 Flash Sante currently has 6 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 cover on BenchLM?

Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 currently has 19 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-sante-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vl-vs-reflection-beam-nvfp4)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 vs Ling 3.0 Flash](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-reflection-beam-nvfp4)

## Explore More

- [Ling 3.0 Flash Sante profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash-sante)
- [Beam 1.0 501B-A23B NVFP4 profile](/models/reflection-beam-nvfp4)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)