# Ling 3.0 Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30B > Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Glimmer 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks. - Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-muse-glimmer-30b - Last updated: September 24, 2026 - Shared sourced benchmarks: 6 - HTML indexing: indexable - Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7 ## Quick Verdict Pick Ling 3.0 Flash if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Muse Glimmer 30B only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score. ## Summary - Ling 3.0 Flash leads overall 45.35 to 41.73. - The clearest category separation is in reasoning, where the averages are 72.2 for Ling 3.0 Flash and 79.3 for Muse Glimmer 30B. - The biggest single benchmark swing is MCP Atlas in Agentic, with scores of 65.5% and 75.5%. - Muse Glimmer 30B is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use. - Ling 3.0 Flash also has the larger context window at 262K. ## Model Snapshot | Property | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | |----------|----------|----------| | Creator | InclusionAI | Meta | | Type | Open Weight | Open Weight | | Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning | | Context | 262K | 131K | | Overall Score | 45.35 | 41.73 | | Benchmarks Covered | 22 | 14 | | Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.00 / $0.00 | ## Category Breakdown ### Agentic - Winner: Directional only - Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 33 (Supported · #61/105) - Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 27.6 (Estimated · #72/105) | Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner | |-----------|-----------|-----------|--------| | MCP Atlas | 65.5% | 75.5% | Muse Glimmer 30B | | skillsBench | 44.8% | 44.3% | Ling 3.0 Flash | | BFCL v4 | 73.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | WideResearch | 73.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | BrowseComp | 72.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | DRACO | 70.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 50.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon | | OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 65.9% | Coming soon | ### Coding - Winner: Directional only - Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 34.9 (Supported · #74/135) - Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 36.3 (Estimated · #69/135) | Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner | |-----------|-----------|-----------|--------| | SWE-bench Pro | 56.6% | 51.2% | Ling 3.0 Flash | | SWE Multilingual | 72.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | LiveCodeBench v5 | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | SciCode | 41.2% | 43.6% | Muse Glimmer 30B | | LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 84.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | SWE-bench (Vals) | 65.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 76% | Coming soon | | Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 51.7% | Coming soon | ### Reasoning - Winner: Not comparable - Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 72.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows) - Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 79.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows) ### Multimodal & Grounded - Winner: Not comparable - Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon - Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 46.3 (#42/50) | Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner | |-----------|-----------|-----------|--------| | CharXiv | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon | | ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon | | OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon | | MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 74% | Coming soon | ### Knowledge - Winner: Directional only - Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 43.1 (Supported · #77/158) - Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 43.9 (Estimated · #75/158) | Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner | |-----------|-----------|-----------|--------| | GPQA | 85.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | GPQA-D | 85.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | HLE | 22.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 84.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon | ### Instruction Following - Winner: Muse Glimmer 30B - Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 72.1 (#63/124) - Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 77.7 (#55/124) | Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner | |-----------|-----------|-----------|--------| | IFBench | 74.5% | 77% | Muse Glimmer 30B | ### Mathematics - Winner: Not comparable - Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 72.9 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows) - Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 75.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row) | Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner | |-----------|-----------|-----------|--------| | AIME26 | 93.2% | 94.7% | Muse Glimmer 30B | | HMMT Feb 2026 | 87.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon | | IMOAnswerBench | 83.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon | ## FAQ ### Which is better overall, Ling 3.0 Flash or Muse Glimmer 30B? Ling 3.0 Flash is ahead overall on BenchLM right now. ### Where is the biggest gap between Ling 3.0 Flash and Muse Glimmer 30B? The widest category gap is in reasoning, where the averages are 72.2 for Ling 3.0 Flash and 79.3 for Muse Glimmer 30B. ### How many benchmarks does Ling 3.0 Flash cover on BenchLM? Ling 3.0 Flash currently has 22 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM. ### How many benchmarks does Muse Glimmer 30B cover on BenchLM? Muse Glimmer 30B currently has 14 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM. ## Related Comparisons - [Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl) - [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vl-vs-muse-glimmer-30b) - [Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash FP8](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-fp8) - [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Ling 3.0 Flash FP8](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-fp8-vs-muse-glimmer-30b) ## Explore More - [Ling 3.0 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash) - [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b) - [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing) - [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder) - [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector) - [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)