# Ling 3.0 Flash vs Phi-4-reasoning

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.0 Flash and Phi-4-reasoning across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-phi-4-reasoning
- Last updated: October 14, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash and Phi-4-reasoning share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.0 Flash has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 3.0 Flash | Phi-4-reasoning |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Microsoft |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 32K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 45.29 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 22 | 6 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 33.8 (Supported · #81/124)
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MCP Atlas | 65.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | 44.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 73.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | 73.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 72.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DRACO | 70.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 50.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 31.8 (Supported · #87/148)
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 56.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | 72.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v5 | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | 41.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 84.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 65.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench | Coming soon | 53.8% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 76 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 43.6 (Supported · #103/181)
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.0% | 65.8% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| GPQA-D | 85.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 22.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 84.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 74.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 75.2 (#64/128)
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 74.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IFEval | Coming soon | 83.4% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 81.1 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Phi-4-reasoning public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Phi-4-reasoning | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 93.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 87.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| IMOAnswerBench | 83.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2024 | Coming soon | 75.3% | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 62.9% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Ling 3.0 Flash and Phi-4-reasoning?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-vl)
- [Phi-4-reasoning vs Ling 3.0 Flash VL](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vl-vs-phi-4-reasoning)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash FP8](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-fp8)
- [Phi-4-reasoning vs Ling 3.0 Flash FP8](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-fp8-vs-phi-4-reasoning)

## Explore More

- [Ling 3.0 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash)
- [Phi-4-reasoning profile](/models/phi-4-reasoning)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)