# Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.6-27B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3.6-27B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 6
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Pick Qwen3.6-27B if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ling 3.0 Flash only makes more sense when its price, context window, or workload-specific category wins matter more than the overall score.

## Summary

- Qwen3.6-27B leads overall 52.72 to 52.2.
- The clearest category separation is in instruction following, where the averages are 75.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash and 82.2 for Qwen3.6-27B.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is SWE-bench Pro in Coding, with scores of 56.6% and 53.5%.
- Qwen3.6-27B is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.6-27B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 262K |
| Overall Score | 52.2 | 52.72 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 22 | 38 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Ling 3.0 Flash
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 40 (Supported · #121/151)
- Qwen3.6-27B public-lane score: 33.9 (Supported · #133/151)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.6-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MCP Atlas | 65.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | 44.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 73.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| WideResearch | 73.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 72.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DRACO | 70.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 50.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 59.3% | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | Coming soon | 72.4% | Coming soon |
| QwenClawBench | Coming soon | 53.4% | Coming soon |
| QwenWebBench | Coming soon | 1487 | Coming soon |
| AndroidWorld | Coming soon | 70.3% | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | Coming soon | 54.84% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 42.8 (Estimated · #126/183)
- Qwen3.6-27B public-lane score: 42.6 (Supported · #128/183)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.6-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 56.6% | 53.5% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| SWE Multilingual | 72.4% | 71.3% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| LiveCodeBench v5 | 82.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | 41.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 84.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 65.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 77.2% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | Coming soon | 59.3% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench | Coming soon | 83.9% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 36.2% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.6-27B public-lane score: 51.9 (#35/48)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.6-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | Coming soon | 82.9% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 84.1% | Coming soon |
| DynaMath | Coming soon | 85.6% | Coming soon |
| MStar | Coming soon | 81.4% | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 56.1% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 78.4% | Coming soon |
| CC-OCR | Coming soon | 81.2% | Coming soon |
| CountBench | Coming soon | 97.8% | Coming soon |
| RefCOCO (avg) | Coming soon | 92.5% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 62.5% | Coming soon |
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | Coming soon | 87.7% | Coming soon |
| VideoMMMU | Coming soon | 84.4% | Coming soon |
| MLVU (M-Avg) | Coming soon | 86.6% | Coming soon |
| V* | Coming soon | 94.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 69.2 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.6-27B public-lane score: 73.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 45.9 (Supported · #112/181)
- Qwen3.6-27B public-lane score: 49 (Estimated · #95/181)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.6-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | 85.0% | 87.8% | Qwen3.6-27B |
| GPQA-D | 85.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE | 22.7% | 24% | Qwen3.6-27B |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 84.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 86.2% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Redux | Coming soon | 93.5% | Coming soon |
| SuperGPQA | Coming soon | 66% | Coming soon |
| C-Eval | Coming soon | 91.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 75.6 (#58/120)
- Qwen3.6-27B public-lane score: 82.2 (#50/120)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.6-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 74.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Coming soon
- Ling 3.0 Flash public-lane score: 73.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.6-27B public-lane score: 72.8 (Unranked · 5 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.0 Flash | Qwen3.6-27B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 93.2% | 94.1% | Qwen3.6-27B |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 87.0% | 84.3% | Ling 3.0 Flash |
| IMOAnswerBench | 83.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | Coming soon | 93.8% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | Coming soon | 90.7% | Coming soon |
| MMAnswerBench | Coming soon | 80.8% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, Ling 3.0 Flash or Qwen3.6-27B?

Qwen3.6-27B is ahead overall on BenchLM right now.

### Where is the biggest gap between Ling 3.0 Flash and Qwen3.6-27B?

The widest category gap is in instruction following, where the averages are 75.6 for Ling 3.0 Flash and 82.2 for Qwen3.6-27B.

### How many benchmarks does Ling 3.0 Flash cover on BenchLM?

Ling 3.0 Flash currently has 22 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Qwen3.6-27B cover on BenchLM?

Qwen3.6-27B currently has 38 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash FP8](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-fp8)
- [Qwen3.6-27B vs Ling 3.0 Flash FP8](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-fp8-vs-qwen3-6-27b)
- [Ling 3.0 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-vs-ling-3-0-flash-fin)
- [Qwen3.6-27B vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin](/compare/ling-3-0-flash-fin-vs-qwen3-6-27b)

## Explore More

- [Ling 3.0 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-0-flash)
- [Qwen3.6-27B profile](/models/qwen3-6-27b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)