# Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-1-flash-vs-muse-spark-1-3
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3 share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- Muse Spark 1.3 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Meta |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 8 | 15 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $1.25 / $4.25 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark 1.3 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| skillsBench | 68.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 52.5% | 49.4% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| CyberGym | 87.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | 57.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DRACO | 85.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 88.8% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 64.9% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 66.9% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 89.4% | Coming soon |
| ApprenticeBench | Coming soon | 19% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | Coming soon | 72.3% | Coming soon |
| CWE-bench v1 | Coming soon | 55.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark 1.3 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| terminalBench4 | 40.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | 55.9% | 59.4% | Muse Spark 1.3 |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 88.8% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| cursorBench40 | Coming soon | 41.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark 1.3 public-lane score: 79.4 (#7/27)

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCR v2 256K-512K | Coming soon | 98.5% | Coming soon |
| MRCR v2 512K-1M | Coming soon | 98.1% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark 1.3 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 65.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Spark 1.3 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Muse Spark 1.3 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Gray Swan IPI (15 attempts) | Coming soon | 15.9% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Ling 3.1 Flash and Muse Spark 1.3?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1](/compare/ling-3-1-flash-vs-muse-spark-1-1)
- [Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.1](/compare/muse-spark-1-1-vs-muse-spark-1-3)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.2](/compare/ling-3-1-flash-vs-muse-spark-1-2)
- [Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.2](/compare/muse-spark-1-2-vs-muse-spark-1-3)

## Explore More

- [Ling 3.1 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-1-flash)
- [Muse Spark 1.3 profile](/models/muse-spark-1-3)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)