# Ling 3.1 Flash vs Fugu Cyber

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Ling 3.1 Flash and Fugu Cyber across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/ling-3-1-flash-vs-sakana-fugu-cyber
- Last updated: September 30, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Ling 3.1 Flash and Fugu Cyber share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Ling 3.1 Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- Fugu Cyber has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Ling 3.1 Flash | Fugu Cyber |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Sakana AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 8 | 2 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $6.00 / $36.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Fugu Cyber public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Fugu Cyber | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| skillsBench | 68.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 52.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 87.9% | 86.9% | Ling 3.1 Flash |
| Finance Agent v2 | 57.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DRACO | 85.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CTI-REALM | Coming soon | 72.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Fugu Cyber public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Fugu Cyber | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| terminalBench4 | 40.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | 55.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Ling 3.1 Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Fugu Cyber public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Ling 3.1 Flash | Fugu Cyber | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 65.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Ling 3.1 Flash and Fugu Cyber?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra](/compare/ling-3-1-flash-vs-sakana-fugu-ultra)
- [Fugu Cyber vs Sakana Fugu-Ultra](/compare/sakana-fugu-cyber-vs-sakana-fugu-ultra)
- [Ling 3.1 Flash vs Sakana Fugu](/compare/ling-3-1-flash-vs-sakana-fugu)
- [Fugu Cyber vs Sakana Fugu](/compare/sakana-fugu-vs-sakana-fugu-cyber)

## Explore More

- [Ling 3.1 Flash profile](/models/ling-3-1-flash)
- [Fugu Cyber profile](/models/sakana-fugu-cyber)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)