# LLaDA2.2-flash vs Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LLaDA2.2-flash and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/llada2-2-flash-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LLaDA2.2-flash and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LLaDA2.2-flash | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 8 | 19 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-flash | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| τ²-bench results | 80.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 64.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | 81.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 46.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v4 | 60.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CoWorkBench | Coming soon | 75.3% | Coming soon |
| AndroidWorld | Coming soon | 87.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 53.5 (Estimated · #45/154)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-flash | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 49.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 30.1% | 63.3% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
| SWE Multilingual | 25% | 80.5% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 48.9% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 57.8% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 92.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 85.1 (Unranked · 7 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-flash | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vision2Web | Coming soon | 62.9% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 71.0% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 76.9% | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 87.7% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 91.8% | Coming soon |
| MathVision w/ Python | Coming soon | 96.2% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 83.5% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 91.4% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 54.9 (Estimated · #54/184)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-flash | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | Coming soon | 91% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 91.0% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 36.5% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 87.7 (#29/124)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-flash | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 81.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LLaDA2.2-flash and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LLaDA2.2-flash vs LLaDA2.2-mini](/compare/llada2-2-flash-vs-llada2-2-mini)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash vs LLaDA2.2-mini](/compare/llada2-2-mini-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash)
- [LLaDA2.2-flash vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-llada2-2-flash)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash)

## Explore More

- [LLaDA2.2-flash profile](/models/llada2-2-flash)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash profile](/models/qwen3-8-omni-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)