# LLaDA2.2-mini vs Muse Glimmer 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LLaDA2.2-mini and Muse Glimmer 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/llada2-2-mini-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Last updated: September 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: LLaDA2.2-mini and Muse Glimmer 30B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has the larger published context window at 131K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | InclusionAI | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 128K | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 44.82 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 9 | 14 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-mini public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 43 (Estimated · #100/152)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| BFCL v4 | 47.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ²-bench results | 57.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 57.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PinchBench | 62.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 75.5% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | Coming soon | 44.3% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 65.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-mini public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 48.1 (Estimated · #70/151)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v6 | 28.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 51.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 76% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 51.7% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 43.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-mini public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 46.4 (#40/48)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 78.8% | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 74% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-mini public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 78.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | 35.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-mini public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 47.1 (Estimated · #100/183)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | 44.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-mini public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 80.1 (#53/123)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 24.9% | 77% | Muse Glimmer 30B |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- LLaDA2.2-mini public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 76.3 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | LLaDA2.2-mini | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 35.0% | 94.7% | Muse Glimmer 30B |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between LLaDA2.2-mini and Muse Glimmer 30B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [LLaDA2.2-mini vs LLaDA2.2-flash](/compare/llada2-2-flash-vs-llada2-2-mini)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs LLaDA2.2-flash](/compare/llada2-2-flash-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [LLaDA2.2-mini vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-llada2-2-mini)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)

## Explore More

- [LLaDA2.2-mini profile](/models/llada2-2-mini)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)