# LongCat-2.5 vs Muse Glimmer 30B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for LongCat-2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/longcat-2-5-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Last updated: November 9, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 4
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Muse Glimmer 30B leads by point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence. Choose using the category evidence and your own workload tests.

## Summary

- Muse Glimmer 30B has the higher overall point estimate 32.41 to 0. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.
- The biggest single benchmark swing is Terminal-Bench 2.1 in Coding, with scores of 88.4% and 51.7%.
- Muse Glimmer 30B is the cheaper option on output tokens, which matters if you expect large responses or heavy interactive use.
- LongCat-2.5 also has the larger context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | LongCat-2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Meituan | Meta |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Hybrid | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 131K |
| Overall Score | null | 32.41 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 22 | 14 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Not comparable
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 19.7 (Estimated · #119/132)

| Benchmark | LongCat-2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 88.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 38.50% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 91.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 51.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | 63.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 38.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | 83.1% | 75.5% | LongCat-2.5 |
| JobBench | 65.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | 63.3% | 44.3% | LongCat-2.5 |
| SpreadsheetBench 2 | 34.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 78.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 74.6% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 65.9% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Not comparable
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 24.6 (Estimated · #125/158)

| Benchmark | LongCat-2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 88.4% | 51.7% | LongCat-2.5 |
| ProgramBench | 25.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | 64.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| PaperBench | 82.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | 58.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | 60.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 51.2% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 76% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 43.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Not comparable
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 28.1 (Estimated · #128/157)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Not comparable
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 41.7 (Estimated · #62/67)

| Benchmark | LongCat-2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vision2Web | 78.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 90.2% | 78.8% | LongCat-2.5 |
| MathVision w/ Python | 96.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Video-MME | 85.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | Coming soon | 75.4% | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | Coming soon | 74% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Not comparable
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 37.6 (Estimated · #124/179)

| Benchmark | LongCat-2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierScience | 77% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Not comparable
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 81.1 (#61/157)

| Benchmark | LongCat-2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 77% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Not comparable
- LongCat-2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 81.1 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

| Benchmark | LongCat-2.5 | Muse Glimmer 30B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 94.7% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Which is better overall, LongCat-2.5 or Muse Glimmer 30B?

Muse Glimmer 30B has the higher overall point estimate. Conditional score ranges do not establish rank confidence.

### How many benchmarks does LongCat-2.5 cover on BenchLM?

LongCat-2.5 currently has 22 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

### How many benchmarks does Muse Glimmer 30B cover on BenchLM?

Muse Glimmer 30B currently has 14 sourced benchmark scores on BenchLM.

## Related Comparisons

- [LongCat-2.5 vs Claude Fable 5.2](/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-longcat-2-5)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5.2](/compare/claude-fable-5-2-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [LongCat-2.5 vs Gemini 4 Carbon](/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-longcat-2-5)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Gemini 4 Carbon](/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)

## Explore More

- [LongCat-2.5 profile](/models/longcat-2-5)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)