# Mercury 3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Mercury 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/mercury-3-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: October 19, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Mercury 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Mercury 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Inception | Xiaomi |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 64.59 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 8 | 12 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.10 / $0.35 | $0.14 / $0.28 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Mercury 3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: 56.2 (Estimated · #39/130)

| Benchmark | Mercury 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| τ³-bench results | 30.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp+ | 55.18% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 71.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 73.6% | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | Coming soon | 52.3% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 27.6% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 28.80% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 87.6% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | Coming soon | 80.8% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 61.2% | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | Coming soon | 95.1% | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | Coming soon | 6.0% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Mercury 3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: 60.2 (Supported · #22/151)

| Benchmark | Mercury 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | 46.3% | 67.9% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| ProgramBench | Coming soon | 26.0% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 87.6% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Mercury 3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: 76 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Mercury 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MRCRv2 | 75.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Mercury 3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: 72.2 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Mercury 3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: 61.5 (Estimated · #46/186)

| Benchmark | Mercury 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | 89.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Mercury 3 public-lane score: Coming soon
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Mercury 3 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 76.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MultiChallenge (provider reports) | 60.35% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Mercury 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Mercury 3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/mercury-3-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [Mercury 3 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-mercury-3)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash)

## Explore More

- [Mercury 3 profile](/models/mercury-3)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile](/models/mimo-v2-6-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)