# MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next
- Last updated: October 10, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Xiaomi | Alibaba |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 53.01 | 64.23 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 13 | 24 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 36.9 (Supported · #70/123)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 59.5 (Estimated · #24/123)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 63.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 72.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 68.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 62.70% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 57.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CoWorkBench | Coming soon | 73.9% | Coming soon |
| JobBench | Coming soon | 55.7% | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | Coming soon | 51.2% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon-Verified | Coming soon | 73.5% | Coming soon |
| AndroidWorld | Coming soon | 84.5% | Coming soon |
| OSWorld 2.0 | Coming soon | 19.4% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 44 (Supported · #53/146)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 52.4 (Supported · #37/146)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 57.2% | 62.5% | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 68.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 81.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 74.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 81% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 48.1% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 58.7% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 91.9% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 80.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 80.9 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 87.7 (#8/54)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Vision2Web | Coming soon | 64.0% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 72.3% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 76.6% | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 88.5% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 90.6% | Coming soon |
| MathVision w/ Python | Coming soon | 95.7% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 84.6% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | Coming soon | 90.6% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 52.5 (Supported · #67/177)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 59.4 (Supported · #47/177)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 48% | 35.9% | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
| HLE w/o tools | 34% | 35.9% | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 82.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 84.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 91.7% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 91.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro public-lane score: 93.8 (#7/127)
- Qwen3.8-Flash-Next public-lane score: 91.2 (#22/127)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.8-Flash-Next | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 81.3% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs MiMo-V2.5](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs MiMo-V2.5](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next)
- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Qwen3.8-Flash-Next vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwen3-8-flash-next)

## Explore More

- [MiMo-V2.5-Pro profile](/models/mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Qwen3.8-Flash-Next profile](/models/qwen3-8-flash-next)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)