# MiMo-V2.5 vs Step 3.7 Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for MiMo-V2.5 and Step 3.7 Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-step-3-7-flash
- Last updated: October 15, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: MiMo-V2.5 and Step 3.7 Flash share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.5 has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.5 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | MiMo-V2.5 | Step 3.7 Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Xiaomi | StepFun |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 256K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | 43.7 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 11 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.20 / $1.15 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 32.8 (Estimated · #85/126)
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 37.1 (Estimated · #74/126)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 62.3% | 67.1% | Step 3.7 Flash |
| MM-ClawBench | 23.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 46.89% | 51.57% | Step 3.7 Flash |
| ResearchClawBench | 16.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 60.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 59.5% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 75.8% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 92.8% | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | Coming soon | 49.5% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/ tools | Coming soon | 47.2% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 34.7 (Supported · #78/149)
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 30.2 (Estimated · #95/149)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 56.1% | 56.3% | Step 3.7 Flash |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 81.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 71.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 59.5% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 76.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 72.2 (#31/54)
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 75.4 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | 87.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 81% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 77.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SimpleVQA | Coming soon | 79.2% | Coming soon |
| V* | Coming soon | 95.3% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 45 (Estimated · #96/182)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Step 3.7 Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 81.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Step 3.7 Flash public-lane score: 82.1 (#54/146)

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between MiMo-V2.5 and Step 3.7 Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Step 3.7 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-step-3-7-flash)
- [MiMo-V2.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-mimo-v2-5)
- [Step 3.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-step-3-7-flash)

## Explore More

- [MiMo-V2.5 profile](/models/mimo-v2-5)
- [Step 3.7 Flash profile](/models/step-3-7-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)