# MiMo-V2.5 vs Trinity-Large-Thinking

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Thinking across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: September 4, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Thinking share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.5 has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.5 has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Xiaomi | Arcee AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 512K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 60.72 | 47.12 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 15 | 5 |
| Pricing (input/output) | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable | $0.25 / $0.90 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 51.1 (Estimated · #58/151)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 41.3 (Estimated · #117/151)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Claw-Eval | 62.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MM-ClawBench | 23.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 46.89% | 32.55% | MiMo-V2.5 |
| ResearchClawBench | 16.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 60.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 54.8 (Estimated · #45/183)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 28.1 (Supported · #172/183)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 56.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 65.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 81.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 71.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified* | Coming soon | 63.2% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 58.5 (#29/48)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Video-MME (with subtitle) | 87.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CharXiv | 81% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 77.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 48.6 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: 53.8 (Estimated · #65/181)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 44.1 (Estimated · #121/181)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 81.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 82.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 76.3% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | Coming soon | 83.4% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 67.5 (#64/120)

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.5 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME25 (Arcee) | Coming soon | 96.3% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between MiMo-V2.5 and Trinity-Large-Thinking?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-5-pro-vs-trinity-large-thinking)
- [MiMo-V2.5 vs Trinity-Large-Preview](/compare/mimo-v2-5-vs-trinity-large-preview)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking vs Trinity-Large-Preview](/compare/trinity-large-preview-vs-trinity-large-thinking)

## Explore More

- [MiMo-V2.5 profile](/models/mimo-v2-5)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking profile](/models/trinity-large-thinking)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)