# MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Quasar 438B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Quasar 438B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-quasar-438b
- Last updated: September 21, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 2
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Quasar 438B share only 2 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 2 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the lower published output-token price.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Quasar 438B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Xiaomi | Multiverse Computing |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 12 | 2 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.14 / $0.28 | $0.60 / $1.80 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Quasar 438B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Quasar 438B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Toolathlon-Verified | 73.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 52.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 27.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 28.80% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 87.6% | 69.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
| OSWorld-Verified | 80.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 61.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 95.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | 6.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Quasar 438B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Quasar 438B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | 67.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | 26.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 87.6% | 69.3% | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon
- Quasar 438B public-lane score: 73.4 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Quasar 438B?

Not yet. The models share only 2 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [Quasar 438B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro](/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-quasar-438b)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash)
- [Quasar 438B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-quasar-438b)

## Explore More

- [MiMo-V2.6-Flash profile](/models/mimo-v2-6-flash)
- [Quasar 438B profile](/models/quasar-438b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)