# MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/mimo-v2-6-pro-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0
- Last updated: October 23, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Pro and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 has the lower published output-token price.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Xiaomi | OrcaRouter |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 73.54 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 14 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.435 / $0.87 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro public-lane score: 67.9 (Estimated · #13/132)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Toolathlon-Verified | 76.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AutomationBench | 53.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Agents' Last Exam | 31.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 34.90% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 89.9% | 72.5% | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
| OSWorld-Verified | 82% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| JobBench | 62.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CyberGym | 94.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ExploitGym | 17.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro public-lane score: 63.4 (Supported · #13/153)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | 71.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ProgramBench | 26.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 89.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Bug Hunt Bench | 22.7 fixes | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro public-lane score: 82.5 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| STEMBench | 2.17 | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro public-lane score: 68.8 (Supported · #19/187)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 88.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: 32.4 (#134/152)

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 82.8% | Coming soon |
| IFBench | Coming soon | 56.3% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro public-lane score: Coming soon
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 96.2% | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 98.6% | Coming soon |
| GSM8K | Coming soon | 97.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash](/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash](/compare/mimo-v2-6-flash-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)

## Explore More

- [MiMo-V2.6-Pro profile](/models/mimo-v2-6-pro)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 profile](/models/orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)