# MiniMax M2.7 vs Sarvam 105B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for MiniMax M2.7 and Sarvam 105B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/minimax-m2-7-vs-sarvam-105b
- Last updated: October 29, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: MiniMax M2.7 and Sarvam 105B share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Sarvam 105B has the lower published output-token price.
- MiniMax M2.7 has the larger published context window at 200K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | MiniMax M2.7 | Sarvam 105B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | MiniMax | Sarvam |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Non-Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 47.29 | 30.79 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 29 | 10 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 33.2 (Supported · #99/135)
- Sarvam 105B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.7 | Sarvam 105B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 57% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| τ³-bench results | 67.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Toolathlon | 46.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MLE-Bench Lite | 66.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MM-ClawBench | 62.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Claw-Eval | 48.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 40.40% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 (Vals) | 48.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 49.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 34.7 (Supported · #85/156)
- Sarvam 105B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.7 | Sarvam 105B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified* | 75.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | 56.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 51.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | 76.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Multi-SWE Bench | 52.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| VIBE-Pro | 55.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | 39.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 57.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vibe Code Bench | 27.04% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| React Native Evals | 71.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals) | 79.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench (Vals) | 73.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 45% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 78.8 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Sarvam 105B public-lane score: 25 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.7 | Sarvam 105B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA Diamond | Coming soon | 78.7% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 45.2 (Supported · #94/179)
- Sarvam 105B public-lane score: 33.7 (Supported · #141/179)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.7 | Sarvam 105B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE | 28% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | 87.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | 80.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA Diamond (Vals) | 86.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Vals) | 80.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU | Coming soon | 90.6% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro | Coming soon | 81.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 93 (#14/157)
- Sarvam 105B public-lane score: 39.1 (#127/157)

| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.7 | Sarvam 105B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | Coming soon | 84.8% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- MiniMax M2.7 public-lane score: 70.5 (Unranked · 4 rankable rows)
- Sarvam 105B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | MiniMax M2.7 | Sarvam 105B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME25 (Arcee) | 80.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME26 | 89.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| HMMT Nov 2025 | 81.0% | 85.8% | Sarvam 105B |
| HMMT Feb 2026 | 72.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 98.6% | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 88.3% | Coming soon |
| HMMT Feb 2025 | Coming soon | 85.8% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between MiniMax M2.7 and Sarvam 105B?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [MiniMax M2.7 vs Gemini 4 Carbon](/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-minimax-m2-7)
- [Sarvam 105B vs Gemini 4 Carbon](/compare/gemini-4-carbon-vs-sarvam-105b)
- [MiniMax M2.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-minimax-m2-7)
- [Sarvam 105B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-sarvam-105b)

## Explore More

- [MiniMax M2.7 profile](/models/minimax-m2-7)
- [Sarvam 105B profile](/models/sarvam-105b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)