# Muse Glimmer 30B vs Pareto 26.9

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Muse Glimmer 30B and Pareto 26.9 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-pareto-26-9
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Muse Glimmer 30B and Pareto 26.9 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has the lower published output-token price.
- Muse Glimmer 30B has the larger published context window at 131K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Muse Glimmer 30B | Pareto 26.9 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Meta | Unbiased |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 131K | N/A |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 45.08 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 14 | 4 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $2.50 / $7.50 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 43.3 (Estimated · #100/154)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MCP Atlas | 75.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 74.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | 44.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 65.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | Coming soon | 51.00% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 48.5 (Estimated · #71/154)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 51.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 51.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 74.0% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 46.3 (#40/48)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | 78.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| ScreenSpot Pro | 75.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 74% | 78% | Pareto 26.9 |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 78.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 47.3 (Estimated · #99/184)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 49% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 77.7 (#55/124)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 77% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 75.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Pareto 26.9 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Pareto 26.9 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 94.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Muse Glimmer 30B and Pareto 26.9?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Pareto 26.9 vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-pareto-26-9)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Pareto 26.9 vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-pareto-26-9)

## Explore More

- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Pareto 26.9 profile](/models/pareto-26-9)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)