# Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/muse-glimmer-30b-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash
- Last updated: September 18, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has the lower published output-token price.
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Meta | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Proprietary |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 45.08 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 14 | 19 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 43.3 (Estimated · #100/154)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MCP Atlas | 75.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | 74.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| skillsBench | 44.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 65.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| CoWorkBench | Coming soon | 75.3% | Coming soon |
| AndroidWorld | Coming soon | 87.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 48.5 (Estimated · #71/154)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 53.5 (Estimated · #45/154)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Pro | 51.2% | 63.3% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 51.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SciCode | 43.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 80.5% | Coming soon |
| NL2Repo | Coming soon | 48.9% | Coming soon |
| DeepSWE | Coming soon | 57.8% | Coming soon |
| LiveCodeBench v6 | Coming soon | 92.6% | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 46.3 (#40/48)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 85.1 (Unranked · 7 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| CharXiv | 78.8% | 91.4% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |
| ScreenSpot Pro | 75.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OmniDocBench 1.5 | 75.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMMU-Pro | 74% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Vision2Web | Coming soon | 62.9% | Coming soon |
| ERQA | Coming soon | 71.0% | Coming soon |
| LVBench | Coming soon | 76.9% | Coming soon |
| RealWorldQA | Coming soon | 87.7% | Coming soon |
| MathVision | Coming soon | 91.8% | Coming soon |
| MathVision w/ Python | Coming soon | 96.2% | Coming soon |
| CharXiv w/o tools | Coming soon | 83.5% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 78.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 47.3 (Estimated · #99/184)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 54.9 (Estimated · #54/184)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA | Coming soon | 91% | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 91.0% | Coming soon |
| HLE | Coming soon | 36.5% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 77.7 (#55/124)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: 87.7 (#29/124)

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | 77% | 81.5% | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Glimmer 30B public-lane score: 75.4 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Glimmer 30B | Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | 94.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Muse Glimmer 30B and Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1](/compare/claude-fable-5-1-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash)
- [Muse Glimmer 30B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-qwen3-8-omni-flash)

## Explore More

- [Muse Glimmer 30B profile](/models/muse-glimmer-30b)
- [Qwen3.8-Omni-Flash profile](/models/qwen3-8-omni-flash)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)