# Muse Wonder vs Beam

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Muse Wonder and Beam across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/muse-wonder-vs-reflection-beam
- Last updated: October 12, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Muse Wonder and Beam share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Beam has the lower published output-token price.
- Muse Wonder has the larger published context window at 1M.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Muse Wonder | Beam |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Meta | Reflection AI |
| Type | Proprietary | Pending |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 1M | null |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 70.44 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 6 | 16 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $4.00 / $20.00 | Pricing unavailable / Pricing unavailable |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Wonder public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| JobBench | 70.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Finance Agent v2 | 56.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |
| MCP Atlas | Coming soon | 78.7% | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | Coming soon | 77.4% | Coming soon |
| DeepSearchQA | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Wonder public-lane score: 69.8 (Supported · #10/148)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| DeepSWE | 78.8% | 44.4% | Muse Wonder |
| ProgramBench | 50.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| sweMarathon | 53.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Pro | Coming soon | 65.5% | Coming soon |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 80.1% | Coming soon |
| SWE-Atlas Codebase QnA | Coming soon | 34.6% | Coming soon |
| SWE Multilingual | Coming soon | 78% | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified | Coming soon | 80.9% | Coming soon |
| SciCode | Coming soon | 49.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Wonder public-lane score: 81.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | Coming soon | 65.5% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Wonder public-lane score: 74 (Supported · #12/180)
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| HealthBench Professional | 60.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 90.5% | Coming soon |
| HLE w/o tools | Coming soon | 36.2% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Wonder public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFBench | Coming soon | 79.7% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Muse Wonder public-lane score: Coming soon
- Beam public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Muse Wonder | Beam | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME26 | Coming soon | 97.8% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Muse Wonder and Beam?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Muse Wonder vs Muse Wonder Full](/compare/muse-wonder-vs-muse-wonder-full)
- [Beam vs Muse Wonder Full](/compare/muse-wonder-full-vs-reflection-beam)
- [Muse Wonder vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-muse-wonder)
- [Beam vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-reflection-beam)

## Explore More

- [Muse Wonder profile](/models/muse-wonder)
- [Beam profile](/models/reflection-beam)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)