# o1 vs OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for o1 and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/o1-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: o1 and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 has the lower published output-token price.
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | o1 | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OpenAI | OrcaRouter |
| Type | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 38.28 | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 4 | 7 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $15.00 / $60.00 | $0.00 / $0.00 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- o1 public-lane score: Coming soon
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | o1 | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | Coming soon | 72.5% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- o1 public-lane score: 27.5 (Estimated · #103/153)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- o1 public-lane score: 69.7 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- o1 public-lane score: 41.4 (Supported · #114/187)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | o1 | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU | 91.8% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | 75.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 88.3% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- o1 public-lane score: 86 (#48/152)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: 32.4 (#134/152)

| Benchmark | o1 | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 92.2% | 82.8% | o1 |
| IFBench | Coming soon | 56.3% | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- o1 public-lane score: 33.5 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | o1 | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3) | 14.737% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2025 | Coming soon | 96.2% | Coming soon |
| MATH-500 | Coming soon | 98.6% | Coming soon |
| GSM8K | Coming soon | 97.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between o1 and OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [o1 vs o1-preview](/compare/o1-vs-o1-preview)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs o1-preview](/compare/o1-preview-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [o1 vs o1-pro](/compare/o1-vs-o1-pro)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs o1-pro](/compare/o1-pro-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)

## Explore More

- [o1 profile](/models/o1)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 profile](/models/orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)