# OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 and Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/orcacyber-nano-1-0-vs-qwen3-32b-reasoning
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 and Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OrcaRouter | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 128K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 11 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 72.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v3 | Coming soon | 70.3% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v5 | Coming soon | 65.7% | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | 88.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Redux | Coming soon | 90.9% | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 68.4% | Coming soon |
| C-Eval | Coming soon | 87.3% | Coming soon |
| MMMLU | Coming soon | 80.6% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| INCLUDE | Coming soon | 73.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: 32.4 (#134/152)
- Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 82.8% | 85% | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) |
| IFBench | 56.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 96.2% | 72.9% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| MATH-500 | 98.6% | 97.2% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| GSM8K | 97.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2024 | Coming soon | 81.4% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 and Qwen3 32B (Reasoning)?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Qwen3 32B](/compare/orcacyber-nano-1-0-vs-qwen3-32b)
- [Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) vs Qwen3 32B](/compare/qwen3-32b-vs-qwen3-32b-reasoning)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwen3-32b-reasoning)

## Explore More

- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 profile](/models/orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [Qwen3 32B (Reasoning) profile](/models/qwen3-32b-reasoning)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)