# OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs QwQ-32B

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 and QwQ-32B across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/orcacyber-nano-1-0-vs-qwq-32b
- Last updated: October 20, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 3
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.8

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 and QwQ-32B share only 3 sourced benchmark rows.

## Summary

- Only 3 shared sourced benchmark rows are available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 has the larger published context window at 262K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | QwQ-32B |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | OrcaRouter | Alibaba |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 131K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | null | null |
| Benchmarks Covered | 7 | 11 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | N/A |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | 72.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BFCL v3 | Coming soon | 66.4% | Coming soon |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LiveCodeBench v5 | Coming soon | 62.7% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: 43.3 (Unranked · 1 rankable row)

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| GPQA-D | 88.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Redux | Coming soon | 90% | Coming soon |
| GPQA | Coming soon | 65.6% | Coming soon |
| C-Eval | Coming soon | 88.4% | Coming soon |
| MMMLU | Coming soon | 80.9% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| INCLUDE | Coming soon | 69.7% | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: 32.4 (#134/152)
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: 44.9 (#110/152)

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 82.8% | 83.9% | QwQ-32B |
| IFBench | 56.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 public-lane score: Coming soon
- QwQ-32B public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 | QwQ-32B | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME 2025 | 96.2% | 69.5% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| MATH-500 | 98.6% | 98% | OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 |
| GSM8K | 97.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| AIME 2024 | Coming soon | 79.5% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 and QwQ-32B?

Not yet. The models share only 3 sourced benchmark rows, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [QwQ-32B vs Claude Opus 5.5](/compare/claude-opus-5-5-vs-qwq-32b)
- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [QwQ-32B vs GPT-6.1 Sol](/compare/gpt-6-1-sol-vs-qwq-32b)

## Explore More

- [OrcaCyber-Nano-1.0 profile](/models/orcacyber-nano-1-0)
- [QwQ-32B profile](/models/qwq-32b)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)