# Qwen3.5-27B vs Trinity-Large-Thinking

> Side-by-side benchmark comparison for Qwen3.5-27B and Trinity-Large-Thinking across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, multilingual, and math tasks.

- Canonical page: https://benchlm.ai/compare/qwen3-5-27b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: September 29, 2026

- Shared sourced benchmarks: 1
- HTML indexing: indexable
- Ranking lane: BenchAlign v5.7

## Quick Verdict

Evidence is too thin for a benchmark verdict: Qwen3.5-27B and Trinity-Large-Thinking share only 1 sourced benchmark row.

## Summary

- Only 1 shared sourced benchmark row is available. That is not enough for a broad capability verdict, so this mirror does not name an overall winner.
- Qwen3.5-27B has the lower published output-token price.
- Trinity-Large-Thinking has the larger published context window at 512K.

## Model Snapshot

| Property | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking |
|----------|----------|----------|
| Creator | Alibaba | Arcee AI |
| Type | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Reasoning | Reasoning | Reasoning |
| Context | 262K | 512K |
| Independent public score (not head-to-head) | 43.77 | 34.23 |
| Benchmarks Covered | 16 | 5 |
| Pricing (input/output) | $0.00 / $0.00 | $0.25 / $0.90 |

## Category Breakdown

### Agentic

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 32.5 (Estimated · #74/117)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 17.7 (Estimated · #104/117)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| Terminal-Bench 2.0 | 41.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| BrowseComp | 61% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| OSWorld-Verified | 56.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| Gert Labs | 39.41% | 32.55% | Qwen3.5-27B |

### Coding

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 32.5 (Estimated · #86/142)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 21 (Supported · #119/142)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| SWE-bench Verified | 72.4% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-Rebench | 58.9% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SWE-bench Verified* | Coming soon | 63.2% | Coming soon |

### Reasoning

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 52.7 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 48.3 (Unranked · 2 rankable rows)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| LongBench v2 | 60.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Multimodal & Grounded

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 71.6 (Unranked · 3 rankable rows)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMMU | 82.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MMVU | 73.3% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| MathVision | 86.0% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| V* | 93.7% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Knowledge

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 42.4 (Supported · #87/168)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 35.9 (Estimated · #114/168)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-Pro | 86.1% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| SuperGPQA | 65.6% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA | 85.5% | Coming soon | Coming soon |
| GPQA-D | Coming soon | 76.3% | Coming soon |
| MMLU-Pro (Arcee) | Coming soon | 83.4% | Coming soon |

### Multilingual

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 36.8 (#9/12)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| MMLU-ProX | 82.2% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Instruction Following

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: 91.5 (#13/124)
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: 66.3 (#68/124)

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| IFEval | 95% | Coming soon | Coming soon |

### Mathematics

- Winner: Insufficient shared evidence
- Qwen3.5-27B public-lane score: Coming soon
- Trinity-Large-Thinking public-lane score: Coming soon

| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-27B | Trinity-Large-Thinking | Winner |
|-----------|-----------|-----------|--------|
| AIME25 (Arcee) | Coming soon | 96.3% | Coming soon |

## FAQ

### Is there enough evidence to pick between Qwen3.5-27B and Trinity-Large-Thinking?

Not yet. The models share only 1 sourced benchmark row, so this mirror reports the available measurements and metadata without naming a broad winner.

### What can I compare safely on this page?

Published pricing, context windows, model type, and individual shared benchmark rows are directly comparable. Independent overall scores and non-overlapping benchmark coverage are labeled separately and should not be read as a controlled head-to-head result.

## Related Comparisons

- [Qwen3.5-27B vs Trinity-Large-Preview](/compare/qwen3-5-27b-vs-trinity-large-preview)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking vs Trinity-Large-Preview](/compare/trinity-large-preview-vs-trinity-large-thinking)
- [Qwen3.5-27B vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-qwen3-5-27b)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking vs GPT-6 Astra](/compare/gpt-6-astra-vs-trinity-large-thinking)

## Explore More

- [Qwen3.5-27B profile](/models/qwen3-5-27b)
- [Trinity-Large-Thinking profile](/models/trinity-large-thinking)
- [Compare Pricing](/llm-pricing)
- [Alternative Finder](/tools/alternative-finder)
- [LLM Selector](/tools/llm-selector)
- [Overall Rankings](/best/overall)