A display-only Artificial Analysis metric for research-level physics reasoning.
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for CritPt. GPT-5.4 Pro leads the public snapshot at 30.0% , followed by GPT-5.5 (27.1%) and Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think (25.7%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI
GPT-5.5
OpenAI
Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think
The published CritPt snapshot is tightly clustered at the top: GPT-5.4 Pro sits at 30.0%, while the third row is only 4.3 points behind. The broader top-10 spread is 17.1 points, so the benchmark still separates strong models even when the leaders cluster.
124 models have been evaluated on CritPt. The benchmark falls in the Reasoning category. This category carries a 17% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. CritPt is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
Year
2026
Tasks
Research-level physics questions
Format
Accuracy
Difficulty
Research-level physics reasoning
BenchLM stores CritPt as a display-only research physics reasoning row from Artificial Analysis benchmark cards.
Version
CritPt 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
A display-only Artificial Analysis metric for research-level physics reasoning.
GPT-5.4 Pro by OpenAI currently leads with a score of 30.0% on CritPt.
124 AI models have been evaluated on CritPt on BenchLM.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.