Skip to main content
BenchLM
Data
Recommendation
Ranking data as of

Best Value LLM Overall in 2026 — Cost-Adjusted Rankings

As of November 13, 2026, the top model among value LLM overall on the BenchLM leaderboard is Qwen3.7 Flash with a score of 363.3.

Full Rankings (127 ranked)

1
Qwen3.7 Flash
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

363.31

Score/$

Score: 47.2 · $0.13/1M

vs #2
2
Mercury 2.5
Inception·Proprietary·260K

219.27

Score/$

Score: 32.9 · $0.15/1M

vs #3
3
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi·Open Weight·1M

194.75

Score/$

Score: 54.5 · $0.28/1M

vs #4
4
Step 3.5 Flash
StepFun·Open Weight·256K

140.73

Score/$

Score: 42.2 · $0.3/1M

vs #5
5
Claude Haiku 5.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

135.28

Score/$

Score: 67.6 · $0.5/1M

vs #6
6
GPT-6 Luna
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

122.26

Score/$

Score: 61.1 · $0.5/1M

vs #7
7
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

118.6

Score/$

Score: 49.8 · $0.42/1M

vs #8
8
Qwen3.5 Flash
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

113.75

Score/$

Score: 45.5 · $0.4/1M

vs #9
9
Muse Ember
Meta·Proprietary·1M

111.66

Score/$

Score: 55.8 · $0.5/1M

vs #10
10
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax·Proprietary·1M

97.8

Score/$

Score: 58.7 · $0.6/1M

vs #11
11
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

92.23

Score/$

Score: 36.9 · $0.4/1M

vs #12
12
Grok 3 Mini
xAI·Proprietary·128K

87.9

Score/$

Score: 44 · $0.5/1M

vs #13
13
Grok 4.1 Fast
xAI·Proprietary·1M

72.18

Score/$

Score: 36.1 · $0.5/1M

vs #14
14
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi·Open Weight·1M

65.8

Score/$

Score: 57.3 · $0.87/1M

vs #15
15
Inkling 2 Small
Thinking Machines Lab·Proprietary·1M

57.84

Score/$

Score: 57.8 · $1/1M

vs #16
16
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

53.73

Score/$

Score: 64.5 · $1.2/1M

vs #17
17
GPT-5.6 Luna
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

52.65

Score/$

Score: 63.2 · $1.2/1M

vs #18
18
Solar Pro 3
Upstage·Proprietary·128K

50.03

Score/$

Score: 30 · $0.6/1M

vs #19
19
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

49.87

Score/$

Score: 20 · $0.4/1M

vs #20
20
Trinity-Large-Thinking
Arcee AI·Open Weight·512K

48.02

Score/$

Score: 43.2 · $0.9/1M

vs #21
21
Mercury 2
Inception·Proprietary·128K

43.52

Score/$

Score: 32.6 · $0.75/1M

vs #22
22
Mistral Small 4
Mistral·Open Weight·256K

43.17

Score/$

Score: 25.9 · $0.6/1M

vs #23
23
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

41.4

Score/$

Score: 24.8 · $0.6/1M

vs #24
24
MiniMax M3
MiniMax·Open Weight·1M

41.18

Score/$

Score: 49.4 · $1.2/1M

vs #25
25
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax·Proprietary·128K

41.08

Score/$

Score: 49.3 · $1.2/1M

vs #26
26
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax·Open Weight·200K

38.99

Score/$

Score: 46.8 · $1.2/1M

vs #27
27
Celeris-1
Celeris·Proprietary·128K

38.77

Score/$

Score: 27.1 · $0.7/1M

vs #28
28
Step 3.7 Flash
StepFun·Open Weight·256K

38.72

Score/$

Score: 44.5 · $1.15/1M

vs #29
29
GPT-5.4 nano
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

36.95

Score/$

Score: 46.2 · $1.25/1M

vs #30
30
Inkling-Small
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

34.64

Score/$

Score: 49.9 · $1.44/1M

vs #31
31
LFM2.5-24B-A2B
LiquidAI·Open Weight·131K

34.43

Score/$

Score: 34.4 · $1/1M

vs #32
32
GLM-4.5-Air
Z.AI·Proprietary·128K

31.55

Score/$

Score: 34.7 · $1.1/1M

vs #33
33
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite
Google·Proprietary·1M

31.08

Score/$

Score: 46.6 · $1.5/1M

vs #34
34
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

28.66

Score/$

Score: 31.5 · $1.1/1M

vs #35
35
Quasar 438B
Multiverse Computing·Proprietary·1M

27.25

Score/$

Score: 49.1 · $1.8/1M

vs #36
36
Mistral Large 4
Mistral·Open Weight·1M

24.8

Score/$

Score: 52.1 · $2.1/1M

vs #37
37
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

23.99

Score/$

Score: 48 · $2/1M

vs #38
38
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI·Proprietary·256K

22.53

Score/$

Score: 33.8 · $1.5/1M

vs #39
39
Mistral Large 3
Mistral·Open Weight·128K

22.22

Score/$

Score: 33.3 · $1.5/1M

vs #40
40
Grok 4.20
xAI·Proprietary·2M

22.11

Score/$

Score: 55.3 · $2.5/1M

vs #41
41
Grok 4.3
xAI·Proprietary·1M

21.03

Score/$

Score: 52.6 · $2.5/1M

vs #42
42
Step 5 Preview
StepFun·Open Weight·1M

20.54

Score/$

Score: 55.5 · $2.7/1M

vs #43
43
Qwen3.5 Plus
Alibaba·Proprietary·1M

20.44

Score/$

Score: 49.1 · $2.4/1M

vs #44
44
Kimi K2.5 (Reasoning)
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·128K

18.88

Score/$

Score: 56.6 · $3/1M

vs #45
45
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google·Proprietary·1M

18.78

Score/$

Score: 47 · $2.5/1M

vs #46
46
DeepSeek-R1
DeepSeek·Open Weight·128K

18.57

Score/$

Score: 40.7 · $2.19/1M

vs #47
47
Gemini 3 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

17.94

Score/$

Score: 53.8 · $3/1M

vs #48
48
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

17.58

Score/$

Score: 65.9 · $3.75/1M

vs #49
49
Kimi K2.5
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

17.52

Score/$

Score: 52.6 · $3/1M

vs #50
50
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

17.19

Score/$

Score: 64.5 · $3.75/1M

vs #51
51
GLM-5
Z.AI·Open Weight·200K

16.94

Score/$

Score: 54.2 · $3.2/1M

vs #52
52
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

16.71

Score/$

Score: 41.8 · $2.5/1M

vs #53
53
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

16.59

Score/$

Score: 62.2 · $3.75/1M

vs #54
54
GPT-6.1 Terra
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

15.93

Score/$

Score: 79.6 · $5/1M

vs #55
55
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
DeepSeek·Open Weight·1M

15.73

Score/$

Score: 62.3 · $3.96/1M

vs #56
56
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

15.68

Score/$

Score: 25.1 · $1.6/1M

vs #57
57
Muse Spark 1.2
Meta·Proprietary·1M

15.32

Score/$

Score: 65.1 · $4.25/1M

vs #58
58
Qwen3.5 397B
Alibaba·Open Weight·128K

15.19

Score/$

Score: 54.7 · $3.6/1M

vs #59
59
Mistral Medium 3
Mistral·Proprietary·128K

14.3

Score/$

Score: 28.6 · $2/1M

vs #60
60
Kimi K2.6
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

14.16

Score/$

Score: 56.6 · $4/1M

vs #61
61
GLM-5.2
Z.AI·Open Weight·1M

13.57

Score/$

Score: 59.7 · $4.4/1M

vs #62
62
Kimi K2.7 Code
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·256K

13.42

Score/$

Score: 53.7 · $4/1M

vs #63
63
Kimi K2
Moonshot AI·Proprietary·128K

13.35

Score/$

Score: 33.4 · $2.5/1M

vs #64
64
GLM-5-Turbo
Z.AI·Proprietary·200K

13.19

Score/$

Score: 52.8 · $4/1M

vs #65
65
GLM-5.1
Z.AI·Open Weight·203K

12.61

Score/$

Score: 55.5 · $4.4/1M

vs #66
66
GLM-5V-Turbo
Z.AI·Proprietary·200K

12.22

Score/$

Score: 48.9 · $4/1M

vs #67
67
GPT-5.4 mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

11.76

Score/$

Score: 52.9 · $4.5/1M

vs #68
68
Grok 4.6
xAI·Proprietary·500K

11.04

Score/$

Score: 66.2 · $6/1M

vs #69
69
Claude 3 Haiku
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

11.02

Score/$

Score: 13.8 · $1.25/1M

vs #70
70
Gemini 4 Hydrogen
Google·Proprietary·1M

10.54

Score/$

Score: 79.1 · $7.5/1M

vs #71
71
Grok 4.5
xAI·Proprietary·500K

10.45

Score/$

Score: 62.7 · $6/1M

vs #72
72
Inkling
Thinking Machines Lab·Open Weight·1M

10.31

Score/$

Score: 48.2 · $4.68/1M

vs #73
73
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google·Proprietary·1M

8.92

Score/$

Score: 89.2 · $10/1M

vs #74
74
o3-mini
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

8.75

Score/$

Score: 38.5 · $4.4/1M

vs #75
75
GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

8.46

Score/$

Score: 84.6 · $10/1M

vs #76
76
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

8.31

Score/$

Score: 83.1 · $10/1M

vs #77
77
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

8.03

Score/$

Score: 40.1 · $5/1M

vs #78
78
Gemini 4 Argon
Google·Proprietary·1M

7.9

Score/$

Score: 79 · $10/1M

vs #79
79
GPT-6 Sol
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

7.74

Score/$

Score: 77.4 · $10/1M

vs #80
80
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·1.05M

7.04

Score/$

Score: 70.4 · $10/1M

vs #81
81
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Google·Proprietary·1M

6.89

Score/$

Score: 62 · $9/1M

vs #82
82
Claude Sonnet 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

6.38

Score/$

Score: 63.8 · $10/1M

vs #83
83
o3
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

6

Score/$

Score: 48 · $8/1M

vs #84
84
GPT-5.6 Terra
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

5.66

Score/$

Score: 68 · $12/1M

vs #85
85
GPT-5.1
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

5.64

Score/$

Score: 56.4 · $10/1M

vs #86
86
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Google·Proprietary·2M

5.56

Score/$

Score: 27.8 · $5/1M

vs #87
87
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

5.26

Score/$

Score: 63.1 · $12/1M

vs #88
88
GPT-5.1-Codex
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

5.09

Score/$

Score: 50.9 · $10/1M

vs #89
89
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google·Proprietary·1M

4.88

Score/$

Score: 48.8 · $10/1M

vs #90
90
Gemini 3 Pro
Google·Proprietary·2M

4.86

Score/$

Score: 58.4 · $12/1M

vs #91
91
Kimi K3
Moonshot AI·Open Weight·1.05M

4.56

Score/$

Score: 68.4 · $15/1M

vs #92
92
GPT-4.1
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

4.53

Score/$

Score: 36.3 · $8/1M

vs #93
93
GPT-5.3 Codex
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

4.41

Score/$

Score: 61.7 · $14/1M

vs #94
94
GPT-5.4
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

4.36

Score/$

Score: 65.4 · $15/1M

vs #95
95
Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

4.33

Score/$

Score: 86.6 · $20/1M

vs #96
96
GPT-5.2
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

4.2

Score/$

Score: 58.9 · $14/1M

vs #97
97
GPT-5.2-Codex
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

3.98

Score/$

Score: 55.7 · $14/1M

vs #98
98
Mistral Medium 3.5 128B
Mistral·Open Weight·256K

3.76

Score/$

Score: 28.2 · $7.5/1M

vs #99
99
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

3.72

Score/$

Score: 55.8 · $15/1M

vs #100
100
GPT-5.6 Sol
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

3.62

Score/$

Score: 72.5 · $20/1M

vs #101
101
Muse Wonder
Meta·Proprietary·1M

3.37

Score/$

Score: 67.4 · $20/1M

vs #102
102
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

3.11

Score/$

Score: 46.7 · $15/1M

vs #103
103
Claude Opus 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·

3.04

Score/$

Score: 76.1 · $25/1M

vs #104
104
Command A+
Cohere·Open Weight·128K

2.86

Score/$

Score: 28.6 · $10/1M

vs #105
105
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.7

Score/$

Score: 67.5 · $25/1M

vs #106
106
Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.66

Score/$

Score: 66.4 · $25/1M

vs #107
107
GPT-4o
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

2.57

Score/$

Score: 25.7 · $10/1M

vs #108
108
Claude 4 Sonnet
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

2.55

Score/$

Score: 38.2 · $15/1M

vs #109
109
Claude Opus 4.7
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.52

Score/$

Score: 63.1 · $25/1M

vs #110
110
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.48

Score/$

Score: 62 · $25/1M

vs #111
111
Claude Fable 5.2
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

2.34

Score/$

Score: 93.7 · $40/1M

vs #112
112
GPT-5.5
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

2.2

Score/$

Score: 66 · $30/1M

vs #113
113
Claude Opus 4.5
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

2.12

Score/$

Score: 53 · $25/1M

vs #114
114
GPT-6 Astra
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

1.71

Score/$

Score: 85.7 · $50/1M

vs #115
115
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

1.69

Score/$

Score: 25.3 · $15/1M

vs #116
116
Claude Fable 5.1
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M

1.58

Score/$

Score: 79.2 · $50/1M

vs #117
117
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic·Proprietary·1M+

1.53

Score/$

Score: 76.3 · $50/1M

vs #118
118
GPT-4 Turbo
OpenAI·Proprietary·128K

0.71

Score/$

Score: 21.2 · $30/1M

vs #119
119
o1
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

0.6

Score/$

Score: 35.8 · $60/1M

vs #120
120
o1-preview
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

0.59

Score/$

Score: 35.6 · $60/1M

vs #121
121
o3-pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

0.56

Score/$

Score: 44.8 · $80/1M

vs #122
122
Claude 4.1 Opus
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

0.54

Score/$

Score: 40.2 · $75/1M

vs #123
123
GPT-5.5 Pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·1M

0.39

Score/$

Score: 71 · $180/1M

vs #124
124
GPT-5.2 Pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·400K

0.39

Score/$

Score: 65.9 · $168/1M

vs #125
125
GPT-5.4 Pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·1.05M

0.37

Score/$

Score: 67 · $180/1M

vs #126
126
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic·Proprietary·200K

0.37

Score/$

Score: 28.1 · $75/1M

vs #127
127
o1-pro
OpenAI·Proprietary·200K

0.06

Score/$

Score: 37 · $600/1M

How to choose

Key Takeaways

The best value model is Qwen3.7 Flash by Alibaba with a provisional Score/$ ratio of 363.31 (score: 47.2, output: $0.13/1M tokens).

The best open-weight model is MiMo-V2.6-Flash at position #3.

127 models are included in this ranking.

Score in Context

What these scores mean

Value scores divide the weighted overall score by output token price (per 1M tokens). Higher means more capability per dollar. Models with no listed price are excluded.

Known limitations

Value rankings favor cheap models even if absolute performance is modest. A model scoring half as well at one-tenth the price wins on value — but may not meet your quality bar. Always check raw scores alongside value rankings.

About this ranking

Ranking data as of November 13, 2026

This ranking answers the simplest question: which model gives you the most benchmark performance per dollar? It divides each model's overall weighted score (across all 8 categories) by its output token price. A very cheap model with a modest overall score can rank high here, so read the score column next to the value column before you shortlist one for mixed workloads.

Unless noted otherwise, ranking surfaces on this page use BenchLM’s provisional leaderboard lane rather than the stricter sourced-only verified leaderboard.

Qwen3.7 Flash leads this ranking with a score of 363.31, followed by Mercury 2.5 (219.27) and MiMo-V2.6-Flash (194.75). There is a significant gap between the leading models and the rest of the field.

The best open-weight option is MiMo-V2.6-Flash (ranked #3 with a score of 194.75). Open-weight models are highly competitive in this category — self-hosting is a viable alternative to proprietary APIs.

This ranking uses provisional overall weighted scores from the active scoring formula. For detailed model profiles, click any model name above. To compare two specific models head-to-head, use the "vs #" links.

Know when it’s worth switching models

The model to choose, the cheaper alternative, and the release we would wait on.

Read a sample issue

Join 7,000+ subscribers.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.