278 models · 253 benchmarks

LLM Leaderboard & AI Model Benchmarks — July 2026

Compare frontier AI models by quality, cost, and context. 70 ranked and 36 verified models among 278 tracked LLMs — 253 benchmarks, real pricing, and runtime data in one place.

The top-ranked model on the BenchLM leaderboard is Claude Fable 5 with an overall score of 92.

Last verified: July 7, 2026

Methodology Providers AI Race

70 ranked · 36 verified

Leaderboard

$0.30 avg output/M

LLM Pricing

Latency & tokens/sec

Speed Dashboard

24 agentic evals

Agent Benchmarks

Decision-ready picks

The fastest way to scan the current BenchLM dataset by outcome instead of just by benchmark.

How BenchLM scores these

Best Overall

Claude Fable 5

overall score

Anthropic

Best Open Weight

GLM-5.2

overall score

Z.AI

Cheapest

Qwen3.6-27B

$0.00

avg / 1M tokens

Alibaba

Fastest

Mercury 2

789

tokens / sec

Inception

Lowest Latency

Command A+

0.25s

to first answer

Cohere

Largest Context

Llama 4 Scout

10M

context window

The LLM leaderboard — July 2026 rankings

Benchmarks, pricing, runtime signals, and context window in one table. Filter state syncs to the URL so every view is shareable. Provisional-ranked mode includes source-unverified non-generated benchmark evidence.

Methodology Providers AI Race

CSV JSON

278 models

Provisional-ranked mode includes source-unverified non-generated benchmark evidence.Score confidence:Full sourced coverageGood sourced coverageLimited sourced coverageEstimated


1 Claude Fable 5 Anthropic	Anthropic	Closed	Current	Reasoning	1M+	$10.00 / $50.00	N/A	N/A	92	100	94	—	80	89	100	88	88	1508.51
2 Claude Mythos 5 Anthropic	Anthropic	Closed	Current	Reasoning	1M+	$10.00 / $50.00	N/A	N/A	90	100	91	—	93	88	100	86	86	—
3 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google	Google	Closed	Current	Standard	1M	$2.00 / $12.00	109	29.71s	89	78	90	96	83	91	100	88	65	1485.8
4 Gemini 3 Pro Deep Think Google	Google	Closed	Current	Reasoning	2M	N/A	N/A	N/A	~88	93	73	89	95	84	78	79	—	1486.39
5 Claude Opus 4.8 Anthropic	Anthropic	Closed	Current	Reasoning	1M	$5.00 / $25.00	N/A	N/A	86	95	91	—	66	88	—	—	85	1476.51
6 GPT-5.4 OpenAI	OpenAI	Closed	Superseded	Reasoning	1.05M	$2.50 / $15.00	74	151.79s	86	89	86	88	60	97	100	93	87	1467.22
7 Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba	Alibaba	Closed	Current	Reasoning	1M	N/A	N/A	N/A	84	78	89	79	—	79	84	90	86	1474.85
8 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic	Anthropic	Closed	Superseded	Standard	1M	$5.00 / $25.00	40	1.78s	84	80	82	88	75	92	100	91	62	1498.93
9 GLM-5.2 Z.AI Self-host	Z.AI	Open	Current	Reasoning	1M	$1.40 / $4.40	N/A	N/A	83	87	80	—	—	85	—	—	85	—
10 GPT-5.3 Codex OpenAI	OpenAI	Closed	Current	Reasoning	400K	$1.75 / $14.00	79	88.26s	~82	79	84	88	91	89	95	88	—	1416
11 Gemini 3.5 Flash Google	Google	Closed	Current	Reasoning	1M	$1.50 / $9.00	284.2	18.55s	81	88	77	73	76	72	—	76	—	1479.46
12 GPT-5.5 OpenAI	OpenAI	Closed	Superseded	Reasoning	1M	$5.00 / $30.00	N/A	N/A	80	97	73	82	58	82	—	—	94	1474.62
13 DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) DeepSeek Self-host	DeepSeek	Open	Current	Reasoning	1M	$1.74 / $3.48	N/A	N/A	80	80	85	—	—	72	—	—	86	—
14 Gemini 3 Pro Google	Google	Closed	Established	Standard	2M	$2.00 / $12.00	109	32.65s	80	83	68	82	80	77	78	80	64	1485.77
15 Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba	Alibaba	Closed	Current	Reasoning	1M	N/A	N/A	N/A	78	70	82	78	73	73	80	89	83	1462.53
16 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic	Anthropic	Closed	Superseded	Standard	200K	$3.00 / $15.00	44	1.48s	78	72	76	81	84	84	90	80	49	1472.16
17 GLM-5 (Reasoning) Z.AI Self-host	Z.AI	Open	Current	Reasoning	200K	$1.00 / $3.20	N/A	N/A	~78	88	69	82	71	78	78	76	37	1455.62
18 Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive) Anthropic	Anthropic	Closed	Superseded	Reasoning	1M	$5.00 / $25.00	N/A	N/A	76	84	83	76	49	85	—	—	75	1501.97
19 DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) DeepSeek Self-host	DeepSeek	Open	Current	Reasoning	1M	$1.74 / $3.48	N/A	N/A	76	70	85	—	—	68	—	—	85	—
20 Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI Self-host	Moonshot AI	Open	Superseded	Reasoning	256K	$0.95 / $4.00	N/A	N/A	75	81	88	—	68	64	—	—	84	1461.37
21 GPT-5.2 OpenAI	OpenAI	Closed	Established	Reasoning	400K	$1.75 / $14.00	73	130.34s	75	53	74	83	81	89	95	79	65	1434.98
22 DeepSeek V4 Flash (Max) DeepSeek Self-host	DeepSeek	Open	Current	Reasoning	1M	$0.14 / $0.28	N/A	N/A	74	68	82	—	—	66	—	—	85	—
23 GPT-5.1 OpenAI	OpenAI	Closed	Established	Reasoning	200K	$1.25 / $10.00	111	57.47s	~73	73	69	66	92	77	84	73	44	1438.78
24 Claude Opus 4.5 Anthropic	Anthropic	Closed	Established	Standard	200K	$5.00 / $25.00	46	1.01s	73	72	73	68	59	81	80	42	78	1468
25 MiniMax M3 MiniMax Self-host	MiniMax	Open	Current	Standard	1M	$0.30 / $1.20	N/A	N/A	72	81	76	—	50	—	—	—	73	1446.54

Showing 25 of 278

Writing about LLMs? Embed this live leaderboard in your post or dashboard — it stays current automatically and includes attribution.

The BenchLM LLM leaderboard 2026 provisionally ranks 70+ models and tracks 278+ large language models side by side across 253 benchmarks — from SWE-bench and LiveCodeBench for coding to GPQA Diamond and MMLU-Pro for knowledge and reasoning. Whether you need the best AI models 2026 has to offer for agentic workflows, math, multilingual tasks, or instruction following, our AI benchmark comparison tables make it easy to see how GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama, and dozens of other frontier and open-source models stack up on both benchmarks and operator tradeoffs like price and context. The main leaderboard now distinguishes provisional ranking from verified ranking so you can see which scores rest on exact-source coverage and which still rely on source-unverified public rows.

What changed in July 2026

Claude Fable 5 (Anthropic) holds the #1 spot on the leaderboard at 92.
5 model releases tracked in July 2026.
36 models now carry fully verified rankings.

Data verified July 7, 2026

Compare models instantly

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Popular Comparisons

GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5 GPT-5.6 Sol vs Claude Opus 4.8 GPT-5.6 Terra vs Gemini 3.5 Flash GPT-5.6 Luna vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Claude Sonnet 5 vs Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 vs GPT-5.5 Claude Opus 4.8 vs Claude Opus 4.7 (Adaptive)Gemini 3.5 Flash vs GPT-5.5 Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Claude Opus 4.7

Tools & Resources

LLM Pricing ComparisonCompare API costs across models Alternative FinderFind the best ChatGPT or Claude replacement Which LLM Should I Use?Get a personalized recommendation Cost CalculatorEstimate your monthly API spend Methodology & ExplainersHow BenchLM scores and curates benchmarks

Scoring Methodology

Each model's overall score is a normalized weighted average of category averages. Within each category, benchmark scores are normalized to a common scale and combined using per-benchmark weights that favor harder, less-saturated evaluations.

Each score includes a confidence indicator (1-4 dots) showing how much sourced benchmark data supports it — models with no non-generated benchmark coverage are marked as estimated.

Display-only benchmarks like MMLU, HumanEval, BBH, LisanBench, FLTEval, and the AIME/HMMT exams remain visible but are excluded from scoring.

Data sourced from OpenBench, official model papers, and public leaderboards. External consensus signals are used as bounded calibration inputs but are not exposed in exported data.

Agentic22%

Terminal-Bench 2.0 · OSWorld-Verified · BrowseComp · GAIA · Tau-Bench · WebArena

Coding20%

SWE-Rebench · SWE-bench Pro · LiveCodeBench · SWE-bench Verified · SciCode

Reasoning17%

LongBench v2 · ARC-AGI-2 · MRCRv2 · MuSR

Multimodal12%

MMMU-Pro · OfficeQA Pro

Knowledge12%

HLE · MMLU-Pro · FrontierScience · SimpleQA · GPQA · SuperGPQA

Multilingual7%

MMLU-ProX · MGSM

Instruction Following5%

IFEval · IFBench

Math5%

FrontierMath · AIME 2025 · BRUMO 2025 · MATH-500