CursorBench v3.2
Cursor's current first-party benchmark for ambiguous, multi-file coding-agent tasks from real Cursor sessions.
Data verifiedBenchmark score on CursorBench v3.2 — July 8, 2026
BenchLM mirrors the published score view for CursorBench v3.2. Claude Fable 5 leads the public snapshot at 70.5% , followed by Grok 4.5 (66.7%) and Claude Opus 4.8 (62.3%). BenchLM does not use these results to rank models overall.
Claude Fable 5
Anthropic
claude-fable-5
Grok 4.5
xAI
grok-4-5
Claude Opus 4.8
Anthropic
claude-opus-4-8
The published CursorBench v3.2 snapshot is tightly clustered at the top: Claude Fable 5 sits at 70.5%, while the third row is only 8.2 points behind. The broader top-10 spread is 21.7 points, so the benchmark still separates strong models even when the leaders cluster.
9 models have been evaluated on CursorBench v3.2. The benchmark falls in the Coding category. This category carries a 20% weight in BenchLM.ai's overall scoring system. CursorBench v3.2 is currently displayed for reference but excluded from the scoring formula, so it does not directly affect overall rankings.
About CursorBench v3.2
Year
2026
Tasks
Harder long-horizon agentic coding tasks
Format
Cursor agent-loop evaluation
Difficulty
Professional agentic software engineering
Cursor reports CursorBench v3.2 on its public evals page for ambiguous, multi-file tasks from real Cursor sessions. BenchLM tracks it as display-only because it is a first-party benchmark and flags Cursor's published Grok 4.5 contamination caveat in provenance.
BenchLM freshness & provenance
Version
CursorBench v3.2 2026
Refresh cadence
Quarterly
Staleness state
Current
Question availability
Public benchmark set
BenchLM uses freshness metadata to decide whether a benchmark should still be treated as a strong differentiator, a benchmark to watch, or a display-only reference. For the full scoring policy, see the BenchLM methodology page.
Benchmark score table (9 models)
FAQ
What does CursorBench v3.2 measure?
Cursor's current first-party benchmark for ambiguous, multi-file coding-agent tasks from real Cursor sessions.
Which model scores highest on CursorBench v3.2?
Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic currently leads with a score of 70.5% on CursorBench v3.2.
How many models are evaluated on CursorBench v3.2?
9 AI models have been evaluated on CursorBench v3.2 on BenchLM.
Compare Top Models on CursorBench v3.2
The AI models change fast. We track them for you.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.