Aion-2.0 vs Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Aion-2.0 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 58 to 42. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Aion-2.0's sharpest advantage is in instruction following, where it averages 93 against 68. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is OpenBookQA, 75 to 35.

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Aion-2.0 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use.

Quick Verdict

Pick Aion-2.0 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.

Agentic

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

51.7

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

45.9

48
Terminal-Bench 2.0
47
60
BrowseComp
48
50
OSWorld-Verified
43

Coding

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

33.2

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

22.8

66
HumanEval
32
35
SWE-bench Verified
16
29
LiveCodeBench
18
37
SWE-bench Pro
29

Multimodal & Grounded

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

66

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

42.1

61
MMMU-Pro
38
72
OfficeQA Pro
47

Reasoning

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

70.3

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

49

76
SimpleQA
38
74
MuSR
36
76
BBH
63
64
LongBench v2
58
65
MRCRv2
58

Knowledge

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

54

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

34.1

78
MMLU
40
77
GPQA
39
75
SuperGPQA
37
75
OpenBookQA
35
67
MMLU-Pro
51
5
HLE
6
66
FrontierScience
42

Instruction Following

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

93

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

68

93
IFEval
68

Multilingual

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

78.1

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

58.8

80
MGSM
62
77
MMLU-ProX
57

Mathematics

Aion-2.0

Aion-2.0

72.1

Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)

48.5

74
AIME 2023
40
76
AIME 2024
42
75
AIME 2025
41
70
HMMT Feb 2023
36
72
HMMT Feb 2024
38
71
HMMT Feb 2025
37
73
BRUMO 2025
39
71
MATH-500
60

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 is ahead overall, 58 to 42. The biggest single separator in this matchup is OpenBookQA, where the scores are 75 and 35.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 54 versus 34.1. Inside this category, OpenBookQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 33.2 versus 22.8. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for math, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 72.1 versus 48.5. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 70.3 versus 49. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 51.7 versus 45.9. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multimodal and grounded tasks, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 66 versus 42.1. Inside this category, OfficeQA Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Aion-2.0 or Qwen3 235B 2507 (Reasoning)?

Aion-2.0 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 78.1 versus 58.8. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 12, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.