Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)

Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 3.5 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 83 to 41. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

DeepSeek V4 Pro (High)'s sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 73.8 against 49. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 49% to 79.4%.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.74 input / $3.48 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V4 Pro (High). That is roughly 4.3x on output cost alone. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. DeepSeek V4 Pro (High) gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.