Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Grok 4.3

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

41

VS

Grok 4.3

79

2 categoriesvs0 categories

Pick Grok 4.3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 3.5 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
49vs47.3

+1.7 difference

Knowledge

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
59.4vs53.9

+5.5 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Grok 4.3

Price (per 1M tokens)

$3 / $15

$1.25 / $2.5

Speed

N/A

209 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

12.36s

Context Window

200K

1M

Quick Verdict

Pick Grok 4.3 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 3.5 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Grok 4.3 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 79 to 41. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $1.25 input / $2.50 output per 1M tokens for Grok 4.3. That is roughly 6.0x on output cost alone. Grok 4.3 is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Grok 4.3 gives you the larger context window at 1M, compared with 200K for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 79 to 41. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 59.4% and 90.1%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4.3?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 59.4 versus 53.9. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Grok 4.3?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 49 versus 47.3. Grok 4.3 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: May 1, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.