Skip to main content

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2.5

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

40

VS

Kimi K2.5

64

0 categoriesvs2 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude 3.5 Sonnet unranked · Kimi K2.5 #15

Pick Kimi K2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 3.5 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Coding

Kimi K2.5
49vs64.2

+15.2 difference

Knowledge

Kimi K2.5
59.4vs65.1

+5.7 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Kimi K2.5

Price (per 1M tokens)

$3 / $15

$0.6 / $3

Speed

N/A

45 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

N/A

2.38s

Context Window

200K

256K

Quick Verdict

Pick Kimi K2.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude 3.5 Sonnet only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.

Kimi K2.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 64 to 40. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Kimi K2.5's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 64.2 against 49. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is GPQA, 59.4% to 87.6%.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is also the more expensive model on tokens at $3.00 input / $15.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.60 input / $3.00 output per 1M tokens for Kimi K2.5. That is roughly 5.0x on output cost alone. Kimi K2.5 gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 64 to 40. The biggest single separator in this matchup is GPQA, where the scores are 59.4% and 87.6%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 65.1 versus 59.4. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 64.2 versus 49. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
API / mo$13,500
Self-host / moN/A
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
Kimi K2.5
API / mo$2,700
Self-host / mo$5,221
Break-even132M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: June 2, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.