Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 60 to 38. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 74.8 against 41.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 77 to 39.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 32K for LFM2-24B-A2B.
Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet if you want the stronger benchmark profile. LFM2-24B-A2B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
55
LFM2-24B-A2B
33.4
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
37.8
LFM2-24B-A2B
18
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
74.8
LFM2-24B-A2B
41.7
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
67.7
LFM2-24B-A2B
46.6
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
50.8
LFM2-24B-A2B
35.6
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
83
LFM2-24B-A2B
68
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
80.5
LFM2-24B-A2B
61.4
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
71.2
LFM2-24B-A2B
50.4
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is ahead overall, 60 to 38. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 77 and 39.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 50.8 versus 35.6. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 37.8 versus 18. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 50.4. Inside this category, MATH-500 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 67.7 versus 46.6. Inside this category, MRCRv2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 55 versus 33.4. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 41.7. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.5 versus 61.4. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.