Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the cleaner overall profile here, landing at 60 versus 57. It is a real lead, but still close enough that category-level strengths matter more than the headline number.
Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet if you want the stronger benchmark profile. MiniMax M2.7 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
55
MiniMax M2.7
57
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
39.7
MiniMax M2.7
56.2
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Comparable scores for this category are coming soon. One or both models do not have sourced results here yet.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is ahead overall, 60 to 57. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Pro, where the scores are 37% and 56.2%.
MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 56.2 versus 39.7. Inside this category, SWE-bench Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
MiniMax M2.7 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 57 versus 55. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.