Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 60 to 55. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 55 against 48.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LongBench v2, 70 to 60.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 14B.
Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 14B only becomes the better choice if its workflow or ecosystem matters more than the raw scoreboard.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
55
Ministral 3 14B
48.4
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
37.8
Ministral 3 14B
33
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
74.8
Ministral 3 14B
70.5
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
67.7
Ministral 3 14B
63.6
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
50.8
Ministral 3 14B
50.1
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
83
Ministral 3 14B
80
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
80.5
Ministral 3 14B
76.8
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
71.2
Ministral 3 14B
69.7
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is ahead overall, 60 to 55. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LongBench v2, where the scores are 70 and 60.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 50.8 versus 50.1. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 37.8 versus 33. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 69.7. Inside this category, MATH-500 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 67.7 versus 63.6. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 55 versus 48.4. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 70.5. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 80. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.5 versus 76.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.