Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 60 to 53. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 37.8 against 24.7. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is LiveCodeBench, 39 to 21.
Seed-2.0-Mini gives you the larger context window at 256K, compared with 200K for Claude 3.5 Sonnet.
Pick Claude 3.5 Sonnet if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Seed-2.0-Mini only becomes the better choice if you need the larger 256K context window.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
55
Seed-2.0-Mini
46.2
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
37.8
Seed-2.0-Mini
24.7
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
74.8
Seed-2.0-Mini
73.1
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
67.7
Seed-2.0-Mini
64.8
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
50.8
Seed-2.0-Mini
44.6
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
83
Seed-2.0-Mini
80
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
80.5
Seed-2.0-Mini
71.8
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
71.2
Seed-2.0-Mini
65.1
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is ahead overall, 60 to 53. The biggest single separator in this matchup is LiveCodeBench, where the scores are 39 and 21.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 50.8 versus 44.6. Inside this category, MMLU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 37.8 versus 24.7. Inside this category, LiveCodeBench is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 71.2 versus 65.1. Inside this category, MATH-500 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 67.7 versus 64.8. Inside this category, BBH is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 55 versus 46.2. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 74.8 versus 73.1. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 83 versus 80. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 80.5 versus 71.8. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.