Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.
Claude 3 Opus is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 51 to 31. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 3 Opus's sharpest advantage is in multimodal & grounded, where it averages 70.3 against 30.4. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is MMMU-Pro, 73 to 25.
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning) is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude 3 Opus is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Claude 3 Opus gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning).
Pick Claude 3 Opus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning) only becomes the better choice if you want the stronger reasoning-first profile.
Claude 3 Opus
48.1
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
34
Claude 3 Opus
19
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
7.2
Claude 3 Opus
70.3
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
30.4
Claude 3 Opus
61.6
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
35.3
Claude 3 Opus
45
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
25.2
Claude 3 Opus
77
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
68
Claude 3 Opus
69.8
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
59.7
Claude 3 Opus
65.9
Ministral 3 3B (Reasoning)
40.9
Claude 3 Opus is ahead overall, 51 to 31. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMMU-Pro, where the scores are 73 and 25.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 45 versus 25.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 19 versus 7.2. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 65.9 versus 40.9. Inside this category, AIME 2023 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 61.6 versus 35.3. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 48.1 versus 34. Inside this category, BrowseComp is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for multimodal and grounded tasks in this comparison, averaging 70.3 versus 30.4. Inside this category, MMMU-Pro is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 77 versus 68. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude 3 Opus has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.8 versus 59.7. Inside this category, MGSM is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.