Side-by-side benchmark comparison across knowledge, coding, math, and reasoning.
Claude 3 Opus is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 53 to 28. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude 3 Opus gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 64K for Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1.
Pick Claude 3 Opus if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority.
Claude 3 Opus
50.2
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1
71.4
Claude 3 Opus
27.7
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1
54.8
Claude 3 Opus is ahead overall, 53 to 28. The biggest single separator in this matchup is MMLU, where the scores are 61 and 71.4.
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.4 versus 50.2. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct v0.1 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 54.8 versus 27.7. Inside this category, HumanEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.