Skip to main content

Model comparison

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek-R1

Data verified

Head-to-head evidence from 0 shared benchmark results across 0 categories. Overall scores shown here use the public BenchAlign v5 ranking lane.

No sourced benchmark result is currently shared by both models. This page therefore compares only the available metadata, pricing, and runtime rows; it does not name a quality winner.
56.58/100
Margin
4.9pts
← winning
DeepSeek
51.67/100
0 category wins0 category wins

Public leaderboard positions: Claude Haiku 4.5 #77 (Estimated); DeepSeek-R1 #103 (Supported). Intervals and evidence labels describe ranking uncertainty, not a guarantee for a specific workload.

Evidence parity. Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek-R1 share 0 comparable benchmark results. 0 of 8 categories are comparable. 5 results are unique to Claude Haiku 4.5; 11 to DeepSeek-R1.

Updated July 21, 2026
Shared results
0
Claude Haiku 4.5 only
5
DeepSeek-R1 only
11
Comparable categories
0 / 8

Benchmark data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek-R1 is coming soon on BenchLM.

Confidence note. This is a partial-evidence comparison with 0 shared benchmark results across 0 evidence categories; 0 of 8 categories currently have scoreable aggregates for both models. Treat the verdict as directional until coverage is more balanced.

Why this result

BenchLM has partial data for these models, but not enough overlapping benchmark coverage to produce a fair score-level comparison yet.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is priced at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek-R1. Claude Haiku 4.5 has the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek-R1.

Operational comparison

Runtime and commercial metrics are compared only when both models have a complete sourced value.

MetricClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Comparison
Input / output priceUSD per 1M tokensClaude Haiku 4.5$1 input / $5 outputDeepSeek-R1$0.55 input / $2.19 outputDeepSeek-R1 has the lower combined listed price.
Generation speedtokens per secondClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableDeepSeek-R1Not availableA complete speed comparison is not available.
First-answer latencyseconds to first tokenClaude Haiku 4.5Not availableDeepSeek-R1Not availableA complete latency comparison is not available.
Context windowmaximum listed tokensClaude Haiku 4.5200KDeepSeek-R1128KClaude Haiku 4.5 lists the larger context window.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Agentic
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Result
JobBenchSource 16.0%Not comparable
τ²-bench resultsSource 36.5%Not comparable
Coding
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Result
SWE-bench VerifiedSource 73.3%Not comparable
AA-SciCodeSource 40.3%Not comparable
Reasoning
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Result
AA-LCRSource 54.7%Not comparable
CritPtSource 1.4%Not comparable
Knowledge
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Result
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexSource 20.1%Not comparable
AA-GPQA DiamondSource 81.3%Not comparable
AA-HLESource 14.9%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience IndexSource -27.1%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience AccuracySource 31.0%Not comparable
AA-Omniscience Hallucination RateSource 84.0%Not comparable
Math
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Result
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)Source 5.903%Not comparable
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)Source 2.083%Not comparable
Multimodal
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Result
Design Arena WebsiteSource 1152Not comparable
Inst. Following
BenchmarkClaude Haiku 4.5DeepSeek-R1Result
AA-IFBenchSource 39.6%Not comparable
Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Can I compare Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek-R1 on BenchLM yet?

Not fully yet. BenchLM is tracking both models, but the sourced benchmark breakdown for this comparison is still coming soon.

Why does this comparison show “coming soon”?

BenchLM only shows category winners and benchmark-level calls when we have sourced results that can be compared fairly. For these models, the public benchmark coverage is not complete enough yet.

What data is available for Claude Haiku 4.5 and DeepSeek-R1 today?

Claude Haiku 4.5: $1.00 input / $5.00 output per 1M tokens DeepSeek-R1: $0.55 input / $2.19 output per 1M tokens Both model pages still include creator, context window, reasoning mode, and other metadata while benchmark coverage fills in.

Self-host vs API cost

Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.

Claude Haiku 4.5
API / mo$4,500
Self-host / moNot listed
Break-even
Proprietary model — self-hosting not applicable.
DeepSeek-R1
API / mo$2,055
Self-host / mo$18,221
Break-even583M/day
Model the full break-even

Related Comparisons

Last updated: July 21, 2026

Choose a model with this week’s evidence

Join 2,000+ readers for ranking moves, pricing changes, and the claims that still need proof.

One email each week. Unsubscribe anytime.