Claude Haiku 4.5 vs DeepSeek V3

Side-by-side benchmark comparison across agentic, coding, multimodal, knowledge, reasoning, and math workflows.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is clearly ahead on the aggregate, 30 to 25. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Haiku 4.5's sharpest advantage is in reasoning, where it averages 63.9 against 24.9. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SimpleQA, 65% to 24.9%. DeepSeek V3 does hit back in mathematics, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Claude Haiku 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $0.80 input / $4.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3. That is roughly 3.6x on output cost alone. Claude Haiku 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Haiku 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if mathematics is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.

Agentic

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Coding

DeepSeek V3

Claude Haiku 4.5

41.5

DeepSeek V3

42

60%
HumanEval
Coming soon
23%
FLTEval
Coming soon
Coming soon
SWE-bench Verified
42%

Multimodal & Grounded

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Reasoning

Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Haiku 4.5

63.9

DeepSeek V3

24.9

65%
SimpleQA
24.9%
63%
MuSR
Coming soon

Knowledge

DeepSeek V3

Claude Haiku 4.5

66

DeepSeek V3

69.6

68%
MMLU
88.5%
67%
GPQA
59.1%
65%
SuperGPQA
Coming soon
63%
OpenBookQA
Coming soon
Coming soon
MMLU-Pro
75.9%

Instruction Following

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Multilingual

Coming soon

Benchmark data for this category is coming soon.

Mathematics

DeepSeek V3

Claude Haiku 4.5

67

DeepSeek V3

90.2

68%
AIME 2023
Coming soon
70%
AIME 2024
39.2%
69%
AIME 2025
Coming soon
64%
HMMT Feb 2023
Coming soon
66%
HMMT Feb 2024
Coming soon
65%
HMMT Feb 2025
Coming soon
67%
BRUMO 2025
Coming soon
Coming soon
MATH-500
90.2%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V3?

Claude Haiku 4.5 is ahead overall, 30 to 25. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SimpleQA, where the scores are 65% and 24.9%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V3?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 69.6 versus 66. Inside this category, MMLU is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V3?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 42 versus 41.5. Claude Haiku 4.5 stays close enough that the answer can still flip depending on your workload.

Which is better for math, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V3?

DeepSeek V3 has the edge for math in this comparison, averaging 90.2 versus 67. Inside this category, AIME 2024 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Haiku 4.5 or DeepSeek V3?

Claude Haiku 4.5 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 63.9 versus 24.9. Inside this category, SimpleQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Last updated: March 17, 2026

Weekly LLM Benchmark Digest

Get notified when new models drop, benchmark scores change, or the leaderboard shifts. One email per week.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We only store derived location metadata for consent routing.