Head-to-head comparison across 3benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.
Claude Opus 4.5
77
DeepSeek V3
36
Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #9 · DeepSeek V3 unranked
Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Coding
+26.7 difference
Knowledge
+3.8 difference
Inst. Following
+6.7 difference
Claude Opus 4.5
DeepSeek V3
$5 / $25
$0.27 / $1.1
46 t/s
N/A
1.01s
N/A
200K
128K
Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. DeepSeek V3 only becomes the better choice if instruction following is the priority or you want the cheaper token bill.
Claude Opus 4.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 77 to 36. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.
Claude Opus 4.5's sharpest advantage is in coding, where it averages 65.9 against 39.2. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is SWE-bench Verified, 80.9% to 42%. DeepSeek V3 does hit back in instruction following, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.
Claude Opus 4.5 is also the more expensive model on tokens at $5.00 input / $25.00 output per 1M tokens, versus $0.27 input / $1.10 output per 1M tokens for DeepSeek V3. That is roughly 22.7x on output cost alone. Claude Opus 4.5 gives you the larger context window at 200K, compared with 128K for DeepSeek V3.
Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 77 to 36. The biggest single separator in this matchup is SWE-bench Verified, where the scores are 80.9% and 42%.
DeepSeek V3 has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 70 versus 66.2. Inside this category, GPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 65.9 versus 39.2. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
DeepSeek V3 has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 86.1 versus 79.4. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.
Estimates at 50,000 req/day · 1000 tokens/req average.
For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.