Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.5 vs GPT-5.3 Codex

Head-to-head comparison across 2benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.5

80

VS

GPT-5.3 Codex

89

1 categoriesvs1 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #7 · GPT-5.3 Codex unranked

Pick GPT-5.3 Codex if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.5 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

GPT-5.3 Codex
62.5vs71.5

+9.0 difference

Coding

Claude Opus 4.5
65.9vs63.1

+2.8 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5

GPT-5.3 Codex

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

$2.5 / $10

Speed

46 t/s

79 t/s

Latency (TTFT)

1.01s

88.26s

Context Window

200K

400K

Quick Verdict

Pick GPT-5.3 Codex if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Claude Opus 4.5 only becomes the better choice if coding is the priority or you would rather avoid the extra latency and token burn of a reasoning model.

GPT-5.3 Codex is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 89 to 80. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

GPT-5.3 Codex's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 71.5 against 62.5. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 59.3% to 77.3%. Claude Opus 4.5 does hit back in coding, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

GPT-5.3 Codex is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Opus 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. GPT-5.3 Codex gives you the larger context window at 400K, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (3)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.3 Codex?

GPT-5.3 Codex is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 89 to 80. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 59.3% and 77.3%.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.3 Codex?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 65.9 versus 63.1. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or GPT-5.3 Codex?

GPT-5.3 Codex has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 71.5 versus 62.5. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 20, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.