Skip to main content

Claude Opus 4.5 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Head-to-head comparison across 6benchmark categories. Overall scores shown here use BenchLM's provisional ranking lane.

Claude Opus 4.5

80

VS

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

68

3 categoriesvs3 categories

Verified leaderboard positions: Claude Opus 4.5 #5 · Qwen3.5-122B-A10B #4

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Category Radar

Head-to-Head by Category

Category Breakdown

Agentic

Claude Opus 4.5
62.5vs56.1

+6.4 difference

Coding

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
65.9vs72

+6.1 difference

Reasoning

Claude Opus 4.5
64.4vs60.2

+4.2 difference

Knowledge

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
66.2vs81.6

+15.4 difference

Multilingual

Claude Opus 4.5
85.7vs82.2

+3.5 difference

Inst. Following

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
79.4vs93.4

+14.0 difference

Operational Comparison

Claude Opus 4.5

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price (per 1M tokens)

$null / $null

$0 / $0

Speed

46 t/s

N/A

Latency (TTFT)

1.01s

N/A

Context Window

200K

262K

Quick Verdict

Pick Claude Opus 4.5 if you want the stronger benchmark profile. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only becomes the better choice if knowledge is the priority or you need the larger 262K context window.

Claude Opus 4.5 is clearly ahead on the provisional aggregate, 80 to 68. The gap is large enough that you do not need to squint at the spreadsheet to see the difference.

Claude Opus 4.5's sharpest advantage is in agentic, where it averages 62.5 against 56.1. The single biggest benchmark swing on the page is Terminal-Bench 2.0, 59.3% to 49.4%. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B does hit back in knowledge, so the answer changes if that is the part of the workload you care about most.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is the reasoning model in the pair, while Claude Opus 4.5 is not. That usually helps on harder chain-of-thought-heavy tests, but it can also mean more latency and more token spend in real use. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B gives you the larger context window at 262K, compared with 200K for Claude Opus 4.5.

Benchmark Deep Dive

Frequently Asked Questions (7)

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Opus 4.5 is ahead on BenchLM's provisional leaderboard, 80 to 68. The biggest single separator in this matchup is Terminal-Bench 2.0, where the scores are 59.3% and 49.4%.

Which is better for knowledge tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for knowledge tasks in this comparison, averaging 81.6 versus 66.2. Inside this category, SuperGPQA is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for coding, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for coding in this comparison, averaging 72 versus 65.9. Inside this category, SWE-bench Verified is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for reasoning, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for reasoning in this comparison, averaging 64.4 versus 60.2. Inside this category, LongBench v2 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for agentic tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for agentic tasks in this comparison, averaging 62.5 versus 56.1. Inside this category, Terminal-Bench 2.0 is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for instruction following, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the edge for instruction following in this comparison, averaging 93.4 versus 79.4. Inside this category, IFEval is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Which is better for multilingual tasks, Claude Opus 4.5 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Claude Opus 4.5 has the edge for multilingual tasks in this comparison, averaging 85.7 versus 82.2. Inside this category, MMLU-ProX is the benchmark that creates the most daylight between them.

Related Comparisons

Last updated: April 10, 2026

The AI models change fast. We track them for you.

For engineers, researchers, and the plain curious — a weekly brief on new models, ranking shifts, and pricing changes.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.